Literature DB >> 22005896

A tailored approach to the management of perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy.

Andreas Polydorou1, Antonios Vezakis, Georgios Fragulidis, Demetrios Katsarelias, Constantinos Vagianos, Georgios Polymeneas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforations remains controversial. Τhe aim of the study was to determine the incidence of perforations following ERCP, their characteristics, operative and non-operative management options and clinical outcome.
METHODS: A retrospective review of ERCP-related perforations, during a 21-year period, was performed. Each perforation was categorized into types I to IV according to the location, mechanism and radiographic evaluation of the injury. Comparisons were made between patients treated operatively and non-operatively.
RESULTS: Forty-four perforations (0.4%) occurred in 9,880 procedures. They were mainly caused by the passage of the endoscope (type I) in 7 (16%) and sphincterotomy (type II) in 30 (68%) patients. The management was non-operative in 32 (72%) and operative in 12 patients. In multivariate analysis, only the type of perforation (type I: endoscope-related) was found significant for predicting operative treatment. The hospital stay was longer for patients requiring an operation (median, 24 vs 9 days). The overall mortality was 2/44 (4.5%). There was no death in the non-operative group.
CONCLUSIONS: The need for immediate operative intervention should be based on the type of injury and clinical findings. Patients with type I perforations should be treated surgically and primary repair should be tried. Patients with type II injuries may be treated initially non-operatively. Delayed operative intervention will be required in a minority of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005896     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1723-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

1.  Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J L Genzlinger; M S McPhee; J K Fisher; K M Jacob; J H Helzberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Hemoclip repair of a sphincterotomy-induced duodenal perforation.

Authors:  T H Baron; C J Gostout; L Herman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Surgical management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations.

Authors:  Madhukumar Preetha; Yaw-Fui A Chung; Weng-Hoong Chan; Hock-Soo Ong; Pierce K H Chow; Wai-Keong Wong; London L P J Ooi; Khee-Chee Soo
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Kelly Knudson; Christopher D Raeburn; Robert C McIntyre; Raj J Shah; Raj J Shaw; Yang K Chen; William R Brown; Gregory Stiegmann
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and subcutaneous emphysema after ERCP.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrara; Carmelo Luigiano; Paola Billi; Elio Jovine; Francesco Cinquantini; Nicola D'Imperio
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.

Authors:  M L Freeman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum.

Authors:  J H de Vries; L E Duijm; W Dekker; G L Guit; J Ferwerda; E T Scholten
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management.

Authors:  R Enns; M A Eloubeidi; K Mergener; P S Jowell; M S Branch; T M Pappas; J Baillie
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations.

Authors:  Ahmad Assalia; Alain Suissa; Anat Ilivitzki; Ahmad Mahajna; Kamal Yassin; Moshe Hashmonai; Michael Moshe Krausz
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-11

10.  Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Javairiah Fatima; Todd H Baron; Mark D Topazian; Scott G Houghton; Corey W Iqbal; Beverly J Ott; David R Farley; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Value of temporary stents for the management of perivaterian perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Sang Min Lee; Kwang Bum Cho
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Immediate detection of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related periampullary perforation: fluoroscopy or endoscopy?

Authors:  Yasuaki Motomura; Kazuya Akahoshi; Junya Gibo; Kenji Kanayama; Shinichiro Fukuda; Shouhei Hamada; Yoshihiro Otsuka; Masaru Kubokawa; Kiyoshi Kajiyama; Kazuhiko Nakamura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Antonios Vezakis; Georgios Fragulidis; Andreas Polydorou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-10

4.  The importance of early recognition in management of ERCP-related perforations.

Authors:  Jason G Bill; Zachary Smith; Joseph Brancheck; Jeffrey Elsner; Paul Hobbs; Gabriel D Lang; Dayna S Early; Koushik Das; Thomas Hollander; Maria B Majella Doyle; Ryan C Fields; William G Hawkins; Steven M Strasberg; Chet Hammill; William C Chapman; Steven Edmundowicz; Daniel K Mullady; Vladimir M Kushnir
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Early management experience of perforation after ERCP.

Authors:  Guohua Li; Youxiang Chen; Xiaojiang Zhou; Nonghua Lv
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Cross-sectional imaging of common and unusual complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Alessandra Pagani; Roberto Bianco
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Non-Operative Management of Type 2 ERCP-Related Retroperitoneal Duodenal Perforations: A 9-Year Experience From a Single Center.

Authors:  Vasileios Theopistos; Georgios Theocharis; Christos Konstantakis; Panagiotis Kitrou; Ioannis Kehagias; Christos Triantos; Konstantinos Thomopoulos
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2018-05-31

8.  Surgical versus non-operative initial management of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Athina A Samara; Alexandros Diamantis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Georgios Mavrovounis; Dimitrios Symeonidis; Ioannis Baloyiannis; Dimitris Zacharoulis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-12

9.  Over-The-Scope Clip for the Immediate Management of Stapfer Type-1 Duodenal Perforation during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Kathryn Gazelakis; Grace Lovett; Robert Chen; Yahya Al-Habbal; Kumanan Nalankilli
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-28

10.  Duodenal Perforation: Outcomes after Surgical Management at a Tertiary Care Centre-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Srinivas Bojanapu; Ronak Atulbhai Malani; Samrat Ray; Vivek Mangla; Naimish Mehta; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.