Literature DB >> 10520612

Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents.

J A Kahn1, V Chiou, J D Allen, E Goodman, S E Perlman, S J Emans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore qualitatively adolescent girls' understanding of Papanicolaou smears and barriers to compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up appointments.
DESIGN: Qualitative analysis, using 3 focus groups and 15 in-depth, semistructured individual interviews.
SETTING: Adolescent Clinic and Young Parents' Program at Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Beliefs and attitudes about Papanicolaou smears and barriers to compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) age of the 15 interview participants was 18.7 (+/- 1.9) years. Knowledge about Papanicolaou smears and pelvic examinations was poor. Most participants believed that their peers receive Papanicolaou smear screening and perceived teenagers to be susceptible to cervical cancer. Perceived benefits to getting Papanicolaou smears were prevention and early detection or diagnosis, and reported barriers included pain or discomfort, embarrassment, fear of finding a problem, fear of the unknown, denial, poor communication or rapport with the provider, not wanting to look for trouble, lack of knowledge, and peers' advice. Participant-generated strategies for how providers could overcome barriers to Papanicolaou smear screening included education and the development of trusting, consistent relationships with providers. Participant-generated strategies for how providers could enhance appointment-keeping among adolescents included telephone and written reminders.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support a behavioral theory-based model of adolescent compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up, which may help to develop strategies to enhance compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up appointments. These strategies include providing in-depth education about Papanicolaou smears, addressing barriers to Papanicolaou smear follow-up, focusing on appropriate provider behaviors, and instituting an appointment reminder system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520612     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.153.10.1046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  10 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Jillian T Henderson; George F Sawaya; Maya Blum; Laura Stratton; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Practice tips. Smear tactics: a more comfortable Papanicolaou test.

Authors:  Nicole Tsang; W E Osmun
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Does a water-based lubricant affect Pap smear and cervical microbiology results?

Authors:  Michal Pawlik; Frank J Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Women's experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; M Diane McKee; Krista Roybal
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Screening adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Lori A Boardman; Katina Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: a cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial.

Authors:  Seonaidh Cotton; Linda Sharp; Claire Cochran; Nicola Gray; Maggie Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Julian Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  HPV vaccine decision making in pediatric primary care: a semi-structured interview study.

Authors:  Cayce C Hughes; Amanda L Jones; Kristen A Feemster; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abirami Kirubarajan; Shannon Leung; Xinglin Li; Matthew Yau; Mara Sobel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Impact of human papillomavirus-related genital diseases on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing: results of an observational, health-related quality of life study in the UK.

Authors:  Géraldine Dominiak-Felden; Catherine Cohet; Samantha Atrux-Tallau; Hélène Gilet; Amanda Tristram; Alison Fiander
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.