Literature DB >> 10512645

Spatial accuracy in food-storing and nonstoring birds.

.   

Abstract

We compared the ability of coal tits, Parus ater (a food-storing species), great tits, P. major, and blue tits, P. caeruleus (two nonstoring species) to remember spatial locations in a spatial delayed-matching-to-sample task. Presentation of a single sample image on a touch screen was followed by a choice phase containing two, three or four images, in which the bird had to choose the original image. Storers made more correct choices than did nonstorers. Performance was affected by the proximity of the distractors: both groups performed less well when distractors were close to the sample although storers were less affected by proximity of distractors than were nonstorers. Both groups made correct decisions sooner than errors. We conclude that the accuracy of spatial memory in food-storing birds is greater than that of nonstorers. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512645     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

Review 1.  Using ecology to guide the study of cognitive and neural mechanisms of different aspects of spatial memory in food-hoarding animals.

Authors:  Tom V Smulders; Kristy L Gould; Lisa A Leaver
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Interaction of memory systems is controlled by context in both food-storing and non-storing birds.

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Caroline G Strang; David F Sherry; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks.

Authors:  R Wehner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Differences in relative hippocampus volume and number of hippocampus neurons among five corvid species.

Authors:  Kristy L Gould; Karl E Gilbertson; Andrew J Hrvol; Joseph C Nelson; Abigail L Seyfer; Rose M Brantner; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Great tits who remember more accurately have difficulty forgetting, but variation is not driven by environmental harshness.

Authors:  Ethan Hermer; Ben Murphy; Alexis S Chaine; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis.

Authors:  Mark O'Hara; Ludwig Huber; Gyula Kopanny Gajdon
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 8.  It Began in Ponds and Rivers: Charting the Beginnings of the Ecology of Fish Cognition.

Authors:  Susan D Healy; B Wren Patton
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.