Literature DB >> 23364270

Differences in relative hippocampus volume and number of hippocampus neurons among five corvid species.

Kristy L Gould1, Karl E Gilbertson, Andrew J Hrvol, Joseph C Nelson, Abigail L Seyfer, Rose M Brantner, Alan C Kamil.   

Abstract

The relative size of the avian hippocampus (Hp) has been shown to be related to spatial memory and food storing in two avian families, the parids and corvids. Basil et al. [Brain Behav Evol 1996;47:156-164] examined North American food-storing birds in the corvid family and found that Clark's nutcrackers had a larger relative Hp than pinyon jays and Western scrub jays. These results correlated with the nutcracker's better performance on most spatial memory tasks and their strong reliance on stored food in the wild. However, Pravosudov and de Kort [Brain Behav Evol 2006;67:1-9] raised questions about the methodology used in the 1996 study, specifically the use of paraffin as an embedding material and recalculation for shrinkage. Therefore, we measured relative Hp volume using gelatin as the embedding material in four North American species of food-storing corvids (Clark's nutcrackers, pinyon jays, Western scrub jays and blue jays) and one Eurasian corvid that stores little to no food (azure-winged magpies). Although there was a significant overall effect of species on relative Hp volume among the five species, subsequent tests found only one pairwise difference, blue jays having a larger Hp than the azure-winged magpies. We also examined the relative size of the septum in the five species. Although Shiflett et al. [J Neurobiol 2002;51:215-222] found a difference in relative septum volume amongst three species of parids that correlated with storing food, we did not find significant differences amongst the five species in relative septum. Finally, we calculated the number of neurons in the Hp relative to body mass in the five species and found statistically significant differences, some of which are in accord with the adaptive specialization hypothesis and some are not.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364270      PMCID: PMC4961358          DOI: 10.1159/000345560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  50 in total

1.  Electrophysiological profile of avian hippocampal unit activity: a basis for regional subdivisions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Douglas Nitz; Verner P Bingman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Effects of captivity and memory-based experiences on the hippocampus in mountain chickadees.

Authors:  Lara D Ladage; Timothy C Roth; Rebecca A Fox; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Continental variation in relative hippocampal volume in birds: the phylogenetic extent of the effect and the potential role of winter temperatures.

Authors:  László Zsolt Garamszegi; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Comparative, in vitro, studies of hippocampal tissue from homing and non-homing pigeon.

Authors:  E Shapiro; A Wieraszko
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory.

Authors:  D J Olson; A C Kamil; R P Balda; P J Nims
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Orexin-saporin lesions of the medial septum impair spatial memory.

Authors:  H R Smith; K C H Pang
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations from different climates: a common garden approach.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Lara D LaDage; Cody A Freas; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Spatial accuracy in food-storing and nonstoring birds.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Differences in hippocampal volume among food storing corvids.

Authors:  J A Basil; A C Kamil; R P Balda; K V Fite
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Effects of short-lasting inactivations of the ventral hippocampus and medial septum on long-term and short-term acquisition of spatial information in rats.

Authors:  B Poucet; T Herrmann; M C Buhot
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Examination of long-term visual memorization capacity in the Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Kevin Leonard; Robert G Cook; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Debbie M Kelly; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Brain size does not predict learning strategies in a serial reversal learning test.

Authors:  Annika Boussard; Séverine D Buechel; Mirjam Amcoff; Alexander Kotrschal; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.312

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.