Literature DB >> 10511108

Histomorphometric studies show that bone formation and bone mineral apposition rates are greater in C3H/HeJ (high-density) than C57BL/6J (low-density) mice during growth.

M H Sheng1, D J Baylink, W G Beamer, L R Donahue, C J Rosen, K H Lau, J E Wergedal.   

Abstract

High-density C3H/HeJ (C3H) and low-density C57BL/6J (B6) mice, with femoral bone density differing by 50%, were chosen as a model to investigate the mechanisms controlling peak bone density and to map peak bone density genes. The present longitudinal study was undertaken to further establish the bone biologic phenotypes of these two inbred strains of mice. To evaluate phenotypic differences in bone formation parameters in C3H and B6 mice between the ages of 6 and 26 weeks, undecalcified ground sections from the diaphyses of the tibia and femur were prepared from mice receiving two injections of tetracycline. Histomorphometric analyses revealed that the cortical bone area was significantly greater (16%-56%, p < 0.001) in both the femur and tibia of the C3H mice than in the B6 mice at all timepoints. This difference in cortical bone area was due to significantly smaller medullary areas in the C3H mice than in the B6 mice. The bone formation rates (BFR) at the endosteum in both the femur and tibia were significantly greater (28%-117%,p < 0.001) in the young C3H mice (6-12 weeks old) than in B6 mice. The higher bone formation in C3H mice was associated with higher values of the bone mineral apposition rate (25%-94%, p < 0.001), and was not associated with higher values of the forming surface length as measured by tetracycline label length. Similar interstrain differences in mineral apposition and bone formation rates were observed in the periosteum of the femur and tibia. In conclusion, the greater bone area in the high-density C3H mice vs. the low-density B6 mice was, in part, due to the greater periosteal and endosteal bone formation rates during growth in the C3H mice. Because the C3H and B6 mice were maintained under identical environmental conditions (diet, lighting, etc.), the observed interstrain differences in bone parameters were the result of the action of genetic factors. Consequently, these two inbred strains of mice are suitable as a model to identify genetic factors responsible for high bone formation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511108     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Functionally improved bone in calbindin-D28k knockout mice.

Authors:  David S Margolis; Devin Kim; John A Szivek; Li-Wen Lai; Yeong-Hau H Lien
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  ENU mutation mapped to a distal region of chromosome 11 is a major determinant of bone size.

Authors:  Bouchra Edderkaoui; Chandrasekhar Kesavan; David J Baylink; Jon E Wergedal; Apurva K Srivastava; Subburaman Mohan
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 5.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

6.  Conditional disruption of miR17-92 cluster in collagen type I-producing osteoblasts results in reduced periosteal bone formation and bone anabolic response to exercise.

Authors:  Subburaman Mohan; Jon E Wergedal; Subhashri Das; Chandrasekhar Kesavan
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Skeletal aging and the adipocyte program: New insights from an "old" molecule.

Authors:  Beata Lecka-Czernik; Clifford J Rosen; Masanobu Kawai
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  In vivo tibial stiffness is maintained by whole bone morphology and cross-sectional geometry in growing female mice.

Authors:  Russell P Main; Maureen E Lynch; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Fourier transform infrared imaging microspectroscopy and tissue-level mechanical testing reveal intraspecies variation in mouse bone mineral and matrix composition.

Authors:  Hayden-William Courtland; Philip Nasser; Andrew B Goldstone; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Load-induced changes in bone stiffness and cancellous and cortical bone mass following tibial compression diminish with age in female mice.

Authors:  Russell P Main; Maureen E Lynch; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.