Literature DB >> 10505876

Dose measurements compared with Monte Carlo simulations of narrow 6 MV multileaf collimator shaped photon beams.

K De Vlamynck1, H Palmans, F Verhaegen, C De Wagter, W De Neve, H Thierens.   

Abstract

Small fields where electronic equilibrium is not achieved are becoming increasingly important in clinical practice. These complex situations give rise to problems and inaccuracies in both dosimetry and analytical/empirical dose calculation, and therefore require other than conventional methods. A natural diamond detector and a Markus parallel plate ionization chamber have been selected for clinical dosimetry in 6 MV photon beams. Results of simulations using the Monte Carlo system BEAM/EGS4 to model the beam geometry have been compared with dose measurements. A modification of the existing component module for multileaf collimators (MLCs) allowed the modeling of a linear accelerator SL 25 (Elekta Oncology Systems) equipped with a MLC with curved leaf-ends. A mechanical measurement method with spacer plates and a light-field edge detection technique are described as methods to obtain geometrical data of collimator openings for application in the Monte Carlo system. Generally a good agreement is found between measurements and calculations of depth dose distributions and deviations are typically less than 1%. Calculated lateral dose profiles slightly exceed measured dose distributions near the higher level of the penumbras for a 10x2 cm2 field, but agree well with the measurements for all other cases. The simulations are also able to predict variations of output factors and ratios of output factors as a function of field width and field-offset. The Monte Carlo results demonstrate that qualitative changes in energy spectra are too small to explain these variations and that especially geometrical factors affect the output factors and depth dose curves and profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10505876     DOI: 10.1118/1.598693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Total scatter factors of small beams: a multidetector and Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Stefania Cora; Carlo Cavedon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Monte Carlo systems used for treatment planning and dose verification.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brualla; Miguel Rodriguez; Antonio M Lallena
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Monte Carlo Modeling of the Agility MLC for IMRT and VMAT Calculations.

Authors:  Shingo Ohira; Hideki Takegawa; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Masahiko Koizumi; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Variation of kQclin,Qmsr (fclin,fmsr) for the small-field dosimetric parameters percentage depth dose, tissue-maximum ratio, and off-axis ratio.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Sam Beddar; Ninfa Satariano; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT.

Authors:  Oscar I Calvo; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Sotirios Stathakis; Carlos Esquivel; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hyojun Park; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Chul Hee Min
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Clinical commissioning and use of the Novalis Tx linear accelerator for SRS and SBRT.

Authors:  Jinkoo Kim; Ning Wen; Jian-Yue Jin; Nicole Walls; Sangroh Kim; Haisen Li; Lei Ren; Yimei Huang; Anthony Doemer; Kathleen Faber; Tina Kunkel; Ahssan Balawi; Kimberly Garbarino; Kenneth Levin; Samir Patel; Munther Ajlouni; Brett Miller; Teamor Nurushev; Calvin Huntzinger; Raymond Schulz; Indrin J Chetty; Benjamin Movsas; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.