Literature DB >> 10504096

Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms.

G M te Brake1, N Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

Scale is an important issue in the automated detection of masses in mammograms, due to the range of possible sizes masses can have. In this work, it was examined if detection of masses can be done at a single scale, or whether it is more appropriate to use the output of the detection method at different scales in a multiscale scheme. Three different pixel-based mass-detection methods were used for this purpose. The first method is based on convolution of a mammogram with the Laplacian of a Gaussian, the second method is based on correlation with a model of a mass, and the third is a new approach, based on statistical analysis of gradient-orientation maps. Experiments with simulated masses indicated that little can be gained by applying the methods at a number of scales. These results were confirmed by experiments on a set of 71 cases (132 mammograms) containing a malignant tumor. The performance of each method in a multiscale scheme was similar to the performance at the optimal single scale. A slight improvement was found for the correlation method when the output of different scales was combined. This was especially evident at low specificity levels. The correlation method and the gradient-orientation-analysis method have similar performances. A sensitivity of approximately 75% is reached at a level of one false positive per image. The method based on convolution with the Laplacian of the Gaussian performed considerably worse, in both a single and multiscale scheme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10504096     DOI: 10.1109/42.790462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  8 in total

1.  A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Jan Pieter A van Delft; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by template matching: optimization of template brightness distribution by means of evolutionary algorithm.

Authors:  Marcin Bator; Mariusz Nieniewski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Joseph Y Lo; Brian P Harrawood; Georgia D Tourassi
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms.

Authors:  Shengzhou Xu; Hong Liu; Enmin Song
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  An improved decision support system for detection of lesions in mammograms using Differential Evolution Optimized Wavelet Neural Network.

Authors:  J Dheeba; S Tamil Selvi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Detection and Weak Segmentation of Masses in Gray-Scale Breast Mammogram Images Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Young Jae Kim; Kwang Gi Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.