Literature DB >> 21748410

Detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by template matching: optimization of template brightness distribution by means of evolutionary algorithm.

Marcin Bator1, Mariusz Nieniewski.   

Abstract

Optimization of brightness distribution in the template used for detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by means of correlation coefficient is presented. This optimization is performed by the evolutionary algorithm using an auxiliary mass classifier. Brightness along the radius of the circularly symmetric template is coded indirectly by its second derivative. The fitness function is defined as the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the mass classifier. The ROC and AUC are obtained for a teaching set of regions of interest (ROIs), for which it is known whether a ROI is true-positive (TP) or false-positive (F). The teaching set is obtained by running the mass detector using a template with a predetermined brightness. Subsequently, the evolutionary algorithm optimizes the template by classifying masses in the teaching set. The optimal template (OT) can be used for detection of masses in mammograms with unknown ROIs. The approach was tested on the training and testing sets of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM). The free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) obtained with the new mass detector seems superior to the FROC for the hemispherical template (HT). Exemplary results are the following: in the case of the training set in the DDSM, the true-positive fraction (TPF) = 0.82 for the OT and 0.79 for the HT; in the case of the testing set, TPF = 0.79 for the OT and 0.72 for the HT. These values were obtained for disease cases, and the false-positive per image (FPI) = 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21748410      PMCID: PMC3264718          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9402-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Development of an automated method for detecting mammographic masses with a partial loss of region.

Authors:  Y Hatanaka; T Hara; H Fujita; S Kasai; T Endo; T Iwase
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.

Authors:  Hans Bornefalk; Anna Bornefalk Hermansson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.

Authors:  Peter Filev; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Rene Vargas-Voracek; David M Catarious; Carey E Floyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.

Authors:  Arnau Oliver; Jordi Freixenet; Joan Martí; Elsa Pérez; Josep Pont; Erika R E Denton; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information.

Authors:  Jordi Freixenet; Arnau Oliver; Robert Martí; Xavier Lladó; Josep Pont; Elsa Pérez; Erika R E Denton; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Current status of CAD utilizing digital mammography in Japan.

Authors:  Nachiko Uchiyama
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 8.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.

Authors:  Matthias Elter; Alexander Horsch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms.

Authors:  Alfonso Rojas Domínguez; Asoke K Nandi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms.

Authors:  S M Lai; X Li; W F Biscof
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.