BACKGROUND: Peripheral endothelial dysfunction (ED) quantified by the determination of flow-mediated dilation (FMD%) of the brachial artery with the use of high-resolution ultrasound is an early marker of atherosclerosis. Although a positive correlation with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported, the unanswered clinical question is the validity of FMD% as a screening test in patients with clinical suspicion of CAD. Thus the aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of FMD% compared with angina pectoris, exercise electrocardiography, and myocardial perfusion imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pilot study, we measured ED in 122 patients scheduled for coronary angiography by using high-resolution ultrasound (13 MHz). We defined ED as FMD% </=4.5%. The presence of CAD was defined as angiographically detectable atherosclerotic vessel alterations of any degree. Exercise electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging had been performed on an outpatient basis. Statistical analysis was conducted by analysis of variance and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. Patients with CAD (n = 101) had a significantly lower FMD% than patients without CAD (n = 21; 3.7% +/- 4.1% vs 7.01% +/- 3.5%, P <.001). A sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 81% with a positive predictive value of 0.95 (72 of 76), and a negative predictive value of 0.41 (17 of 46) was calculated. In comparison to angina pectoris (sensitivity 95%, specificity 47.6%), exercise electrocardiography (sensitivity 82.4%, specificity 57.1%) and myocardial perfusion imaging (sensitivity in our study group 100%) had the best specificity, and a high sensitivity for FMD% was found. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of ED was found to be a sensitive and specific screening test to predict the presence of CAD. Because this is a noninvasive, nonradioactive, and cost-effective approach, it warrants further evaluation to determine its value in daily clinical practice as an additional screening test in the diagnosis of CAD.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral endothelial dysfunction (ED) quantified by the determination of flow-mediated dilation (FMD%) of the brachial artery with the use of high-resolution ultrasound is an early marker of atherosclerosis. Although a positive correlation with coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported, the unanswered clinical question is the validity of FMD% as a screening test in patients with clinical suspicion of CAD. Thus the aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of FMD% compared with angina pectoris, exercise electrocardiography, and myocardial perfusion imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this pilot study, we measured ED in 122 patients scheduled for coronary angiography by using high-resolution ultrasound (13 MHz). We defined ED as FMD% </=4.5%. The presence of CAD was defined as angiographically detectable atherosclerotic vessel alterations of any degree. Exercise electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging had been performed on an outpatient basis. Statistical analysis was conducted by analysis of variance and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. Patients with CAD (n = 101) had a significantly lower FMD% than patients without CAD (n = 21; 3.7% +/- 4.1% vs 7.01% +/- 3.5%, P <.001). A sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 81% with a positive predictive value of 0.95 (72 of 76), and a negative predictive value of 0.41 (17 of 46) was calculated. In comparison to angina pectoris (sensitivity 95%, specificity 47.6%), exercise electrocardiography (sensitivity 82.4%, specificity 57.1%) and myocardial perfusion imaging (sensitivity in our study group 100%) had the best specificity, and a high sensitivity for FMD% was found. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of ED was found to be a sensitive and specific screening test to predict the presence of CAD. Because this is a noninvasive, nonradioactive, and cost-effective approach, it warrants further evaluation to determine its value in daily clinical practice as an additional screening test in the diagnosis of CAD.
Authors: Georgios I Papaioannou; Christos Kasapis; Richard L Seip; Neil J Grey; Deborah Katten; Frans J Th Wackers; Silvio E Inzucchi; Samuel Engel; Amy Taylor; Lawrence H Young; Deborah A Chyun; Janice A Davey; Ami E Iskandrian; Robert E Ratner; Evelyn C Robinson; Stella Carolan; Gary V Heller Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: William Bilsborough; Helen Keen; Andrew Taylor; Gerard J O'Driscoll; Leonard Arnolda; Daniel J Green Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2006-06-24 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: György Kerekes; Pál Soltész; Michael T Nurmohamed; Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Maurizio Turiel; Edit Végh; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Iain McInnes; Zoltán Szekanecz Journal: Nat Rev Rheumatol Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 20.543
Authors: Wen-Chih Wu; Satish C Sharma; Gaurav Choudhary; Linda Coulter; Elizabeth Coccio; Charles B Eaton Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Andrew W Gardner; Donald E Parker; Polly S Montgomery; Danuta Sosnowska; Ana I Casanegra; Omar L Esponda; Zoltan Ungvari; Anna Csiszar; William E Sonntag Journal: Angiology Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 3.619