BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether arterial diameter, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and arterial range are affected by spinal cord injury (SCI). We assessed arm (radial) and leg (posterior-tibial) arteries that are comparable in size and function to determine whether (a) arterial function is reduced in individuals with SCI vs nondisabled subjects and (b) decrements to SCI arterial function are greater in the legs vs arms. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen men with chronic (9.8 +/- 6.3 years) SCI (T2 to T11; American Spinal Injury Association A) and 13 nondisabled subjects matched for age (33.1 +/- 4.8 vs 29.8 +/- 8.2 years old, respectively), height, and weight (BMI = 25.3 +/- 5.8 vs 26.6 +/- 5.5 kg/m2, respectively). METHODS: Radial and posterior tibial artery B-mode ultrasound images were continuously captured to measure resting diameter, occluded diameter, and postischemic diameters. Hierarchical linear modeling accounted for the nested experimental design. RESULTS: Individuals with SCI have lower systemic (arm + leg) FMD than nondisabled subjects (9.3% vs 12.3%, respectively; P= 0.035), primarily because of reduced leg FMD (11.5 +/- 3.1% vs 7.0 +/- 2.8% for SCI arms vs legs, respectively; P = 0.010). Persons with SCI also had lower arterial range than nondisabled subjects (0.79 vs 1.00 mm, respectively; P = 0.043), primarily because of the legs (0.81 +/- 0.09 vs 0.56 +/- 0.11 mm for SCI arms vs legs, respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Leg arterial function seems to deteriorate at greater rates compared to the arms for individuals with SCI. Interventions to improve cardiovascular health should include measurements taken in the legs.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether arterial diameter, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and arterial range are affected by spinal cord injury (SCI). We assessed arm (radial) and leg (posterior-tibial) arteries that are comparable in size and function to determine whether (a) arterial function is reduced in individuals with SCI vs nondisabled subjects and (b) decrements to SCI arterial function are greater in the legs vs arms. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen men with chronic (9.8 +/- 6.3 years) SCI (T2 to T11; American Spinal Injury Association A) and 13 nondisabled subjects matched for age (33.1 +/- 4.8 vs 29.8 +/- 8.2 years old, respectively), height, and weight (BMI = 25.3 +/- 5.8 vs 26.6 +/- 5.5 kg/m2, respectively). METHODS: Radial and posterior tibial artery B-mode ultrasound images were continuously captured to measure resting diameter, occluded diameter, and postischemic diameters. Hierarchical linear modeling accounted for the nested experimental design. RESULTS: Individuals with SCI have lower systemic (arm + leg) FMD than nondisabled subjects (9.3% vs 12.3%, respectively; P= 0.035), primarily because of reduced leg FMD (11.5 +/- 3.1% vs 7.0 +/- 2.8% for SCI arms vs legs, respectively; P = 0.010). Persons with SCI also had lower arterial range than nondisabled subjects (0.79 vs 1.00 mm, respectively; P = 0.043), primarily because of the legs (0.81 +/- 0.09 vs 0.56 +/- 0.11 mm for SCI arms vs legs, respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION:Leg arterial function seems to deteriorate at greater rates compared to the arms for individuals with SCI. Interventions to improve cardiovascular health should include measurements taken in the legs.
Authors: Luc M Van Bortel; Daniel Duprez; Mirian J Starmans-Kool; Michel E Safar; Christina Giannattasio; John Cockcroft; Daniel R Kaiser; Christian Thuillez Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: M S Nash; P L Jacobs; B M Montalvo; K J Klose; R S Guest; B M Needham-Shropshire Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michiel W P Bleeker; Patricia C E De Groot; Fleur Poelkens; Gerard A Rongen; Paul Smits; Maria T E Hopman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2004-12-02 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: S Schroeder; M D Enderle; R Ossen; C Meisner; A Baumbach; M Pfohl; C Herdeg; M Oberhoff; H U Haering; K R Karsch Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ashraf S Gorgey; Mark K Timmons; David R Dolbow; Justin Bengel; Kendall C Fugate-Laus; Lori A Michener; David R Gater Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Andrew J Maiorana; Gerry O'Driscoll; Nigel T Cable; Maria T E Hopman; Daniel J Green Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: M Kooijman; D H J Thijssen; P C E de Groot; M W P Bleeker; H J M van Kuppevelt; D J Green; G A Rongen; P Smits; M T E Hopman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: James Faulkner; Louis Martinelli; Kirsty Cook; Lee Stoner; Helen Ryan-Stewart; Eloise Paine; Helen Hobbs; Danielle Lambrick Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 1.985