Literature DB >> 10496059

Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus increase postoperative morbidity?

Y Tabira1, T Okuma, K Kondo, M Yoshioka, T Mori, M Tanaka, K Nakano, N Kitamura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus increased the incidence of postoperative complications, and which clinicopathological factors may affect postoperative complications after esophagectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for a carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus were reviewed in a retrospective study. Ninety-six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 48 did not. The postoperative complications were grouped either general complications (Complications A) or surgery-related complications (Complications B). Complications A consisted of pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic, renal, and neurological complications, and catheter sepsis. Complications B consisted of a gastrointestinal tract leak, gastrointestinal tract necrosis, an intrathoracic or intraabdominal abscess, hemorrhage, ileus, and vocal cord palsy. In these two categories of complications, 17 factors obtained from subjects were compared between patients with complications and those without by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The patient characteristics did not differ between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those without. The preoperative serum albumin level was higher in patients without complication than in those with complication in both two categories of complications (Complications A: p = 0.001, Complications B: p = 0.05). The proportion of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not differ between patients with complication and those without complication in either category of complications. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative Onodera's Prognostic Nutritional Index was the only factor reducing the incidence of complications A (p = 0.02, Odds ratio: 0.63).
CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and was not associated with any increased morbidity or mortality after esophagectomy for a carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10496059     DOI: 10.1007/BF03218027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1344-4964


  18 in total

1.  Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; S Chow; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Significance of three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus based on depth of tumor infiltration, lymph nodal involvement and survival rate.

Authors:  Y Tabira; N Kitamura; M Yoshioka; M Tanaka; K Nakano; N Toyota; T Mori
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.888

3.  Selection of operation for esophageal cancer based on staging.

Authors:  D B Skinner; A G Little; M K Ferguson; A Soriano; V M Staszak
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Herskovic; K Martz; M al-Sarraf; L Leichman; J Brindle; V Vaitkevicius; J Cooper; R Byhardt; L Davis; B Emami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Preoperative in vitro chemosensitivity test of esophageal cancer with endoscopic specimens.

Authors:  K Kondo; T Okuma; M Yoshioka; Y Torigoe; Y Miyauchi; T Katsuki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Preoperative chemotherapy, surgical resection, and selective postoperative therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  A D Hilgenberg; R W Carey; E W Wilkins; N C Choi; D J Mathisen; H C Grillo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  M J Heslin; L Latkany; D Leung; A D Brooks; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; M Shike; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term results of subtotal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  M Baba; T Aikou; H Yoshinaka; S Natsugoe; T Fukumoto; H Shimazu; K Akazawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Early enteral feeding in postsurgical cancer patients. Fish oil structured lipid-based polymeric formula versus a standard polymeric formula.

Authors:  A S Kenler; W S Swails; D F Driscoll; S J DeMichele; B Daley; T J Babineau; M B Peterson; B R Bistrian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  H Fujita; T Kakegawa; H Yamana; I Shima; Y Toh; Y Tomita; T Fujii; K Yamasaki; K Higaki; T Noake
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of pretreatment asymptomatic renal dysfunction on clinical course after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Kirihataya; Kohei Wakatsuki; Sohei Matsumoto; Hiroshi Nakade; Tomohiro Kunishige; Shintaro Miyao; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Expense and benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  J W Heise; H Heep; T Frieling; M Sarbia; K A Hartmann; H D Röher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The Effect of Intraoperative Fentanyl Consumption on Prognosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis treated by Simultaneous Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Yizhou Zhang; Qichen Chen; Xiao Chen; Mingzhu Zhang; Peng Li; Zhen Huang; Hong Zhao; Hongliang Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Prognostic significance of preoperative prognostic nutritional index in colorectal cancer: results from a retrospective cohort study and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuchong Yang; Peng Gao; Xiaowan Chen; Yongxi Song; Jinxin Shi; Junhua Zhao; Jingxu Sun; Yingying Xu; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Development of Novel Prognostic Prediction Models including the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Patients with Colorectal Cancer after Curative Resection.

Authors:  Masaru Sasaki; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Shiki Fujino; Satoshi Ishikawa; Kazuhiro Saso; Hidekazu Takahashi; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Taishi Hata; Chu Matsuda; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2019-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.