Literature DB >> 10495101

Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.

E S Berner1, R S Maisiak, C G Cobbs, O D Taunton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines how the information provided by a diagnostic decision support system for clinical cases of varying diagnostic difficulty affects physicians' diagnostic performance.
METHODS: A national sample of 67 internists, 35 family physicians, and 6 other physicians used the Quick Medical Reference (QMR) diagnostic decision support system to assist them in the diagnosis of written clinical cases. Three sets of eight cases, stratified by diagnostic difficulty and the potential of QMR to produce high-quality information, were used. The effects of using QMR on three measures of physicians' diagnostic performance were analyzed using analyses of variance.
RESULTS: Physicians' diagnostic performance was significantly higher (p < 0.01) on the easier cases and the cases for which QMR could provide higher-quality information.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' diagnostic performance can be strongly influenced by the quality of information the system produces and the type of cases on which the system is used.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10495101      PMCID: PMC61384          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  27 in total

1.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effect of a computer-assisted general medicine diagnostic consultation service on housestaff diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  R A Bankowitz; M A McNeil; S M Challinor; R A Miller
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Computer-assisted diagnosis.

Authors:  P T Swender; W W Tunnessen; F A Oski
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1974-06

4.  Computer-assisted pediatric diagnosis.

Authors:  J S O'Shea
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1975-02

5.  Impact of a system of computer-assisted diagnosis. Initial evaluation of the hospitalized patient.

Authors:  J R Wexler; P T Swender; W W Tunnessen; F A Oski
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1975-02

6.  Paradigms and problem-solving: a literature review.

Authors:  E S Berner
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-08

7.  Evaluating RECONSIDER. A computer program for diagnostic prompting.

Authors:  S J Nelson; M S Blois; M S Tuttle; M Erlbaum; P Harrison; H Kim; B Winkelmann; D Yamashita
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Internist-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine.

Authors:  R A Miller; H E Pople; J D Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Computer evaluation of acid-base disorders.

Authors:  H L Bleich
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  The INTERNIST-1/QUICK MEDICAL REFERENCE project--status report.

Authors:  R A Miller; M A McNeil; S M Challinor; F E Masarie; J D Myers
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1986-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Influence of case and physician characteristics on perceptions of decision support systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Comparison of measures to assess change in diagnostic performance due to a decision support system.

Authors:  R S Maisiak; E S Berner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Clinician performance and prominence of diagnoses displayed by a clinical diagnostic decision support system.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Richard S Maisiak; Gustavo R Heuderbert; K Randall Young
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Ritika R Kapoor; Michael Coren; Vasantha Nanduri; Amanda L Tomlinson; Paul M Taylor; Jeremy C Wyatt; Joseph F Britto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Precision diagnosis: a view of the clinical decision support systems (CDSS) landscape through the lens of critical care.

Authors:  Arnaud Belard; Timothy Buchman; Jonathan Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Christopher J Dente; Allan Kirk; Eric Elster
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Patient safety-related information technology utilization in urban and rural hospitals.

Authors:  Robert G Brooks; Nir Menachemi; Darrell Burke; Art Clawson
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  A conceptual framework and protocol for defining clinical decision support objectives applicable to medical specialties.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Cheryl L Damberg; Eric C Schneider; Douglas S Bell
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Analysis of a multilevel diagnosis decision support system and its implications: a case study.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-González; Javier Torres-Niño; Miguel A Mayer; Giner Alor-Hernandez; Mark D Wilkinson
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Riches; Maria Panagioti; Rahul Alam; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Stephen Campbell; Aneez Esmail; Peter Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.