Literature DB >> 1091140

Impact of a system of computer-assisted diagnosis. Initial evaluation of the hospitalized patient.

J R Wexler, P T Swender, W W Tunnessen, F A Oski.   

Abstract

Computer assisted diagnosis was evaluated for its ability to hasten the time to initial diagnosis and reduce laboratory studies. The time to diagnosis averaged 2.8 days for a control group and 1.9 days for the group in which the computer printout was made available. In a small group in whom the diagnosis was not established until after 48 hours, there was a further trend to reduction in number of days to diagnosis and irrelevant laboratory studies. The ability of the computer to include the final diagnosis in the initial list of differential diagnoses remained unchanged for patients whose conditions were diagnosed before or after 48 hours, while the physicians' ability decreased. In a university hospital setting, computer-assisted diagnosis may be most beneficial for patients whose conditions have not been diagnosed within 48 hours of admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1091140     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120390037008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dis Child        ISSN: 0002-922X


  9 in total

1.  Influence of case and physician characteristics on perceptions of decision support systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak; C G Cobbs; O D Taunton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Ritika R Kapoor; Michael Coren; Vasantha Nanduri; Amanda L Tomlinson; Paul M Taylor; Jeremy C Wyatt; Joseph F Britto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Craig Kuziemsky; Morgan Price; Jesse Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Relationships among performance scores of four diagnostic decision support systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; J R Jackson; J Algina
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  A D Oxman; M A Thomson; D A Davis; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Diagnostic omission errors in acute paediatric practice: impact of a reminder system on decision-making.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Andrew Winrow; Michael Coren; Vasanta Nanduri; Roger Buchdahl; Benjamin Jacobs; Helen Fisher; Paul M Taylor; Jeremy C Wyatt; Joseph Britto
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Differential Diagnoses (DDX) Generators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Riches; Maria Panagioti; Rahul Alam; Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Stephen Campbell; Aneez Esmail; Peter Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.