Literature DB >> 14728137

Clinician performance and prominence of diagnoses displayed by a clinical diagnostic decision support system.

Eta S Berner1, Richard S Maisiak, Gustavo R Heuderbert, K Randall Young.   

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can impact both diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, but physicians sometimes fail to heed the appropriate CDSS advice, or become influenced in a negative way by the CDSS. This study examined the relationships among clinicians' prior diagnostic accuracy, the performance of a diagnostic CDSS, and how the CDSS influenced the accuracy of the clinician's subsequent diagnoses. Results showed that (1) clinicians who already were considering the correct diagnosis prior to using the CDSS were more likely to get the CDSS to produce the correct diagnosis in a prominent position than those not considering it initially; (2) physicians are strongly anchored by their initial diagnoses prior to using the CDSS; and (3) changes in the clinicians' diagnoses after using the CDSS are related to presence or absence of the correct diagnosis in the top 10 diagnoses displayed by the CDSS.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728137      PMCID: PMC1480080     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  8 in total

1.  Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.

Authors:  E S Berner; R S Maisiak; C G Cobbs; O D Taunton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Comparison of measures to assess change in diagnostic performance due to a decision support system.

Authors:  R S Maisiak; E S Berner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices.

Authors:  J M Teich; P R Merchia; J L Schmiz; G J Kuperman; C D Spurr; D W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-09

4.  Preventing exacerbation of an ADE with automated decision support.

Authors:  William L Galanter; Robert J DiDomenico; Audrius Polikaitis
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2002

5.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems.

Authors:  C P Friedman; A S Elstein; F M Wolf; G C Murphy; T M Franz; P S Heckerling; P L Fine; T M Miller; V Abraham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems.

Authors:  E S Berner; G D Webster; A A Shugerman; J R Jackson; J Algina; A L Baker; E V Ball; C G Cobbs; V W Dennis; E P Frenkel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic decision support systems: how to determine the gold standard?

Authors:  Eta S Berner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Informatics challenges for the impending patient information explosion.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Jacqueline Moss
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Diagnostic decision support systems: why aren't they used more and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Eta S Berner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  Can cognitive biases during consumer health information searches be reduced to improve decision making?

Authors:  Annie Y S Lau; Enrico W Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Ethical and legal issues in the use of health information technology to improve patient safety.

Authors:  Eta S Berner
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2008-09

Review 6.  Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators.

Authors:  Kate Goddard; Abdul Roudsari; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Are residents' decisions influenced more by a decision aid or a specialist's opinion? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitchell A Medow; Hal R Arkes; Victoria A Shaffer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Do people experience cognitive biases while searching for information?

Authors:  Annie Y S Lau; Enrico W Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  It is time to talk about people: a human-centered healthcare system.

Authors:  Meghan M Searl; Lea Borgi; Zeina Chemali
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-11-26

Review 10.  Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches.

Authors:  Dan Svenstrup; Henrik L Jørgensen; Ole Winther
Journal:  Rare Dis       Date:  2015-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.