Literature DB >> 10493141

In vivo friction properties of human skin.

M Zhang1, A F Mak.   

Abstract

In vivo frictional properties of human skin and five materials, namely aluminium, nylon, silicone, cotton sock, Pelite, were investigated. Normal and untreated skin over six anatomic regions of ten normal subjects were measured under a controlled environment. The average coefficient of friction for all measurements is 0.46+/-0.15 (p<0.05). Among all measured sites, the palm of the hand has the highest coefficient of friction (0.62+/-0.22). For all the materials tested, silicone has the highest coefficient of friction (0.61+/-0.21), while nylon has the lowest friction (0.37+/-0.09).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10493141     DOI： 10.3109/03093649909071625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN： 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  30 in total

1.  Biomechanical behavior of plantar fat pad in healthy and degenerative foot conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Federica Nalesso; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Arturo N Natali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Biomechanical analysis of suture locations of the distal plantar fascia in partial foot.

Authors:  Jun-Chao Guo; Li-Zhen Wang; Zhong-Jun Mo; Wei Chen; Yu-Bo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Effects of ambient conditions on the risk of pressure injuries in bedridden patients-multi-physics modelling of microclimate.

Authors:  Tal Zeevi; Ayelet Levy; Neima Brauner; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Effectiveness of braces designed using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and finite element simulation compared to CAD/CAM only for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Cobetto; C E Aubin; S Parent; J Clin; S Barchi; I Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles.

Authors:  L-C Gerhardt; V Strässle; A Lenz; N D Spencer; S Derler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Clinical significance of musculoskeletal finite element model of the second and the fifth foot ray with metatarsal cavities and calcaneal sinus.

Authors:  Lijun Wu; Shizhen Zhong; Rongmei Zheng; Jia Qu; Zihai Ding; Maolin Tang; Xiangyang Wang; Jianjun Hong; Xiangwu Zheng; Xiaoping Wang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Analysis of the effects of surface stiffness on the contact interaction between a finger and a cylindrical handle using a three-dimensional hybrid model.

Authors:  John Z Wu; Ren G Dong; Christopher M Warren; Daniel E Welcome; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Biomechanical response of the plantar tissues of the foot in healthy and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Raffaele De Caro; Arturo Nicola Natali
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.