Literature DB >> 18331977

Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles.

L-C Gerhardt1, V Strässle, A Lenz, N D Spencer, S Derler.   

Abstract

Friction and shear forces, as well as moisture between the human skin and textiles are critical factors in the formation of skin injuries such as blisters, abrasions and decubitus. This study investigated how epidermal hydration affects the friction between skin and textiles.The friction between the inner forearm and a hospital fabric was measured in the natural skin condition and in different hydration states using a force plate. Eleven males and eleven females rubbed their forearm against the textile on the force plate using defined normal loads and friction movements. Skin hydration and viscoelasticity were assessed by corneometry and the suction chamber method, respectively.In each individual, a highly positive linear correlation was found between skin moisture and friction coefficient (COF). No correlation was observed between moisture and elasticity, as well as between elasticity and friction. Skin viscoelasticity was comparable for women and men. The friction of female skin showed significantly higher moisture sensitivity. COFs increased typically by 43% (women) and 26% (men) when skin hydration varied between very dry and normally moist skin. The COFs between skin and completely wet fabric were more than twofold higher than the values for natural skin rubbed on a dry textile surface.Increasing skin hydration seems to cause gender-specific changes in the mechanical properties and/or surface topography of human skin, leading to skin softening and increased real contact area and adhesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331977      PMCID: PMC2607440          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  46 in total

1.  In vivo friction properties of human skin.

Authors:  M Zhang; A F Mak
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Hydration disrupts human stratum corneum ultrastructure.

Authors:  Ronald R Warner; Keith J Stone; Ying L Boissy
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Indentometric analysis of in vivo skin and comparison with artificial skin models.

Authors:  J Jachowicz; R McMullen; D Prettypaul
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Frictional properties of skin: proposal of a new approach.

Authors:  A A Koudine; M Barquins; P H Anthoine; L Aubert; J L Lévêque
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.970

5.  Multicentre comparison of skin hydration in terms of physical-, physiological- and product-dependent parameters by the capacitive method (Corneometer CM 825).

Authors:  U Heinrich; U Koop; M-C Leneveu-Duchemin; K Osterrieder; S Bielfeldt; C Chkarnat; J Degwert; D Häntschel; S Jaspers; H-P Nissen; M Rohr; G Schneider; H Tronnier
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  Water content and thickness of the stratum corneum contribute to skin surface morphology.

Authors:  J Sato; M Yanai; T Hirao; M Denda
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.017

7.  The skin and friction: deviations from Amonton's laws, and the effects of hydration and lubrication.

Authors:  S Comaish; E Bottoms
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo.

Authors:  P G Agache; C Monneur; J L Leveque; J De Rigal
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Differences in corneocyte surface area in pre- and post-menopausal women. Assessment with the noninvasive videomicroscopic imaging of corneocytes method (VIC) under basal conditions.

Authors:  J W Fluhr; A Pelosi; S Lazzerini; S Dikstein; E Berardesca
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol       Date:  2001

Review 10.  Moisturization and skin barrier function.

Authors:  A V Rawlings; C R Harding
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.851

View more
  47 in total

1.  Effects of skin wrinkles, age and wetness on mechanical loads in the stratum corneum as related to skin lesions.

Authors:  Ran Sopher; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Characterization of skin friction coefficient, and relationship to stratum corneum hydration in a normal Chinese population.

Authors:  Y H Zhu; S P Song; W Luo; P M Elias; M Q Man
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Comparing visual and objective skin assessment with pressure injury risk.

Authors:  Caroline J Borzdynski; William McGuiness; Charne Miller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Effect of skin hydration on the dynamics of fingertip gripping contact.

Authors:  T André; V Lévesque; V Hayward; P Lefèvre; J-L Thonnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Mathematical and computational modelling of skin biophysics: a review.

Authors:  Georges Limbert
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Body-monitoring with photonic textiles: a reflective heartbeat sensor based on polymer optical fibres.

Authors:  Brit M Quandt; Fabian Braun; Damien Ferrario; René M Rossi; Anke Scheel-Sailer; Martin Wolf; Gian-Luca Bona; Rudolf Hufenus; Lukas J Scherer; Luciano F Boesel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch.

Authors:  Michael J Adams; Simon A Johnson; Philippe Lefèvre; Vincent Lévesque; Vincent Hayward; Thibaut André; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Skin stiffness determined from occlusion of a horizontally running microvessel in response to skin surface pressure: a finite element study of sacral pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamada; Yoshiaki Inoue; Yuki Shimokawa; Keisuke Sakata
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.

Authors:  Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva; Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Microclimate and development of pressure ulcers and superficial skin changes.

Authors:  Saldy Yusuf; Mayumi Okuwa; Yoshie Shigeta; Misako Dai; Terumi Iuchi; Sulaiman Rahman; Awaluddin Usman; Sukmawati Kasim; Junko Sugama; Toshio Nakatani; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.