Literature DB >> 10492871

Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography.

D Rotten1, J M Levaillant, L Zerat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the appearance of normal breast tissue and breast masses with three-dimensional ultrasound mammography, and evaluate the contribution of this to the diagnosis of breast masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 186 solid hypoechoic breast masses were analyzed with two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography. Three-dimensional planar reformatted sections were reconstructed along planes either orthogonal or parallel to the skin surface.
RESULTS: With parallel planar reformatted sections all the masses tended to be round. Margins were clearly demonstrated. In case of carcinomas, circumferential jagging was present in the equatorial planes. In case of fibroadenomas, complete wall continuity of the mass was readily apparent. The hyperechoic bands of fibrous tissue peripheral to the masses appeared either as distinct from the central image (compressive pattern) or converged towards the hypoechoic central core of the mass, producing a stellar pattern (converging pattern). These two patterns were preferentially associated with benign lesions and carcinomas, respectively. Three-dimensional ultrasound mammography had higher specificity, but lower sensitivity, than two-dimensional ultrasound mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional reconstruction, in particular parallel planar reformatted sections, represents a valuable adjunct to the characterization of breast masses using ultrasongraphy. Further studies are necessary to assess the validity of the present findings, particularly with regard to the rarer, more unusual types of carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10492871     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14020114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

1.  [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].

Authors:  D Kotsianos; S Wirth; T Fischer; K Hiltawsky; H Sittek; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison between different imaging techniques in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions: can 3D ultrasound be useful?

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Viviana Londero; Giuseppe Como; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?

Authors:  Christian Weismann; Christian Mayr; Heike Egger; Alena Auer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography.

Authors:  Zhi Li Wang; Jian Hong Xu; Jian Hong Xw; Jun Lai Li; Yan Huang; Jie Tang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Correlation between three-dimensional ultrasound features and pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Ya-qing Chen; Yi-zhuan Xu; Ming-li Chen; Yun-kai Zhu; Wen-bin Guan; Xiao-jin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  3-Dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Added value of color patterns with emphasis on crater sign of coronal plane.

Authors:  Ya-Ling Chen; Cai Chang; Wei Zeng; Fen Wang; Jia-Jian Chen; Ning Qu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Automated Breast Ultrasound: Interobserver Agreement, Diagnostic Value, and Associated Clinical Factors of Coronal-Plane Image Features.

Authors:  Guoxue Tang; Xin An; Huiling Xiang; Lixian Liu; Anhua Li; Xi Lin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kalmantis; C Dimitrakakis; Ch Koumpis; A Tsigginou; N Papantoniou; S Mesogitis; A Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.