Literature DB >> 10491980

From the gate to the neuromatrix.

R Melzack1.   

Abstract

The gate control theory's most important contribution to understanding pain was its emphasis on central neural mechanisms. The theory forced the medical and biological sciences to accept the brain as an active system that filters, selects and modulates inputs. The dorsal horns, too, were not merely passive transmission stations but sites at which dynamic activities (inhibition, excitation and modulation) occurred. The great challenge ahead of us is to understand brain function. I have therefore proposed that the brain possesses a neural network--the body-self neuromatrix--which integrates multiple inputs to produce the output pattern that evokes pain. The body-self neuromatrix comprises a widely distributed neural network that includes parallel somatosensory, limbic and thalamocortical components that subserve the sensory-discriminative. affective-motivational and evaluative-cognitive dimensions of pain experience. The synaptic architecture of the neuromatrix is determined by genetic and sensory influences. The 'neurosignature' output of the neuromatrix--patterns of nerve impulses of varying temporal and spatial dimensions--is produced by neural programs genetically build into the neuromatrix and determines the particular qualities and other properties of the pain experience and behavior. Multiple inputs that act on the neuromatrix programs and contribute to the output neurosignature include. (1) sensory inputs (cutaneous, visceral and other somatic receptors); (2) visual and other sensory inputs that influence the cognitive interpretation of the situation; (3) phasic and tonic cognitive and emotional inputs from other areas of the brain; (4) intrinsic neural inhibitory modulation inherent in all brain function; (5) the activity of the body's stress-regulation systems, including cytokines as well as the endocrine, autonomic, immune and opioid systems. We have traveled a long way from the psychophysical concept that seeks a simple one-to-one relationship between injury and pain. We now have a theoretical framework in which a genetically determined template for the body-self is modulated by the powerful stress system and the cognitive functions of the brain, in addition to the traditional sensory inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10491980     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00145-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  183 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system mechanisms in Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  O P van Bijsterveld; A A Kruize; R L A W Bleys
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue?

Authors:  India Morrison; Donna Lloyd; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of brain correlates of placebo analgesia in human experimental pain.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo A Porro; Sara Palermo; Franco Cauda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Therapist as operator or interactor? Moving beyond the technique.

Authors:  Diane F Jacobs; Jason L Silvernail
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

5.  A genome-wide Drosophila screen for heat nociception identifies α2δ3 as an evolutionarily conserved pain gene.

Authors:  G Gregory Neely; Andreas Hess; Michael Costigan; Alex C Keene; Spyros Goulas; Michiel Langeslag; Robert S Griffin; Inna Belfer; Feng Dai; Shad B Smith; Luda Diatchenko; Vaijayanti Gupta; Cui-Ping Xia; Sabina Amann; Silke Kreitz; Cornelia Heindl-Erdmann; Susanne Wolz; Cindy V Ly; Suchir Arora; Rinku Sarangi; Debasis Dan; Maria Novatchkova; Mark Rosenzweig; Dustin G Gibson; Darwin Truong; Daniel Schramek; Tamara Zoranovic; Shane J F Cronin; Belinda Angjeli; Kay Brune; Georg Dietzl; William Maixner; Arabella Meixner; Winston Thomas; J Andrew Pospisilik; Mattias Alenius; Michaela Kress; Sai Subramaniam; Paul A Garrity; Hugo J Bellen; Clifford J Woolf; Josef M Penninger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  [Imaging techniques and pain].

Authors:  C Maihöfner; U Bingel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Time, space and form: Necessary for causation in health, disease and intervention?

Authors:  David W Evans; Nicholas Lucas; Roger Kerry
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

8.  Insula-specific responses induced by dental pain. A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  A Gutzeit; D Meier; M L Meier; C von Weymarn; D A Ettlin; N Graf; J M Froehlich; C A Binkert; M Brügger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Antihyperalgesic effects of imidazoline I(2) receptor ligands in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jun-Xu Li; David A Thorn; Yanyan Qiu; Bi-Wen Peng; Yanan Zhang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Cerebral cortex modulation of pain.

Authors:  Yu-feng Xie; Fu-quan Huo; Jing-shi Tang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.