Literature DB >> 10491949

An empirically based model of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

C A Miller1, P J Abbas, J T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

The relationship between electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials and the electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve is of interest to those attempting to model such responses with computational techniques. It also relates to efforts to exploit the gross potentials that can now be recorded by some implantable cochlear prostheses. In this paper, we develop a computational model of the auditory nerve response to single, pulsatile, electrical stimuli based upon the response characteristics obtained from 230 single fibers of 13 cats. These fibers were stimulated by brief (39s) monophasic cathodic stimuli delivered by a monopolar intracochlear electrode. The data were pooled to obtain an estimate of the distribution of fiber thresholds. Post-stimulus time histograms were modeled using Poisson functions and adjusted to account for empirically determined latency and jitter characteristics. The probabilistic nature of single-fiber input-output functions (i.e. Verveen's (1961) 'relative spread') was also modelled. PST histograms from 5000 modelled fibers were then summed and convolved with an estimated 'unit potential' following the method of Goldstein and Kiang (1958). This convolution produced modelled compound action potentials, which were then compared with experimentally obtained data. Manipulations of model parameters affecting threshold, jitter, and relative spread suggest that the most important determinant of the shape of the EAP amplitude-level function is the threshold distribution. A model based solely on threshold distribution produces an EAP input-output function similar to one that accounts for probabilistic single-fiber input-output functions. Discrepancies between these two models do occur if the threshold distribution function is compressed significantly, as might be the case in pathological cochleae with altered distributions or numbers of nerve fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10491949     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00081-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-10

3.  Temporary hearing loss influences post-stimulus time histogram and single neuron action potential estimates from human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xing Li; Kaibao Nie; Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein; Les E Atlas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

Review 6.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

7.  Complementary metrics of human auditory nerve function derived from compound action potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Kenneth I Vaden; Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Comparison of Multi-Compartment Cable Models of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers.

Authors:  Richard Bachmaier; Jörg Encke; Miguel Obando-Leitón; Werner Hemmert; Siwei Bai
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  François Guérit; Jeremy Marozeau; Bastian Epp; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-24

10.  Interpreting the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and on Neural Health Estimates.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Colette M McKay; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.