Literature DB >> 10489706

Virtual localization improved by scaling nonindividualized external-ear transfer functions in frequency.

J C Middlebrooks1.   

Abstract

This study examined virtual sound localization in three conditions that differed according to the directional transfer functions (DTFs) that were used to synthesize the virtual targets. The own-ear and other-ear conditions used DTFs measured from listeners' own ears and those measured from other subjects, respectively. The scaled-ear condition employed other-ear DTFs that were scaled in frequency to minimize the mismatch between spectral features in the listener's and the other subject's DTFs. All measures of localization error typically were lowest in the own-ear condition. In other-ear conditions, all error measures tended to increase in proportion to the inter-subject differences in DTFs. When spectral features in an other-ear set of DTFs fell systematically lower in frequency than in a listener's own DTFs, low frontal targets typically were reported as low in the rear, and high rear targets were reported as high in front. When spectral features in a set of DTFs fell systematically higher in frequency than in a listener's own DTFs, elevation judgements showed an upward bias. In the scaled-ear condition, all measures of performance tended to improve relative to the other-ear condition. In the majority of cases, frequency scaling more than halved the penalty for use of another subject's DTFs.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10489706     DOI: 10.1121/1.427147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Plasticity in the neural coding of auditory space in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  A J King; C H Parsons; D R Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The acoustical bright spot and mislocalization of tones by human listeners.

Authors:  Eric J Macaulay; William M Hartmann; Brad Rakerd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Information conveyed by inferior colliculus neurons about stimuli with aligned and misaligned sound localization cues.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Two-dimensional localization of virtual sound sources in cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Adaptive reweighting of auditory localization cues in response to chronic unilateral earplugging in humans.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Oliver Kacelnik; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Median-plane sound localization as a function of the number of spectral channels using a channel vocoder.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Sound localization cues in the marmoset monkey.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.