Literature DB >> 10485349

Potential underreporting of energy intake in the Ontario Health Survey and its relationship with nutrient and food intakes.

J Pomerleau1, T Ostbye, E Bright-See.   

Abstract

This study investigated potential underreporting of energy intake in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey (OHS). Underreporting was higher in overweight individuals, Asian-born individuals, and respondents from urban areas. Intakes of underreporters were slightly closer to current dietary guidelines (less fat, more fruit and vegetables, fewer sweets). These results underline that caution is warranted when interpreting the association of dietary data with health outcomes.

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10485349     DOI： 10.1023/a:1007512420937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN： 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  20 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 2.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording.

Authors:  G R Goldberg; A E Black; S A Jebb; T J Cole; P R Murgatroyd; W A Coward; A M Prentice
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report.

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.694

4.  The use of 24-h urine samples and energy expenditure to validate dietary assessments.

Authors:  S A Bingham
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Determinants of obesity-related underreporting of energy intake.

Authors:  L A Braam; M C Ocké; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; J C Seidell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake.

Authors:  A E Black; A M Prentice; G R Goldberg; S A Jebb; S A Bingham; M B Livingstone; W A Coward
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1993-05

7.  Comparison of energy intakes determined by food records and doubly labeled water in women participating in a dietary-intervention trial.

Authors:  L J Martin; W Su; P J Jones; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; N F Boyd
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys.

Authors:  A E Black; G R Goldberg; S A Jebb; M B Livingstone; T J Cole; A M Prentice
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Correlates of body mass index in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey.

Authors:  T Ostbye; J Pomerleau; M Speechley; L L Pederson; K N Speechley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.

Authors:  J R Hebert; L Clemow; L Pbert; I S Ockene; J K Ockene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.196
View more
  15 in total

1.  Reply to LS Freedman et al.

Authors:  Edward Archer; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Fish intake or omega-3 fatty acids: greater than the sum of all parts?

Authors:  Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong; Rajiv Chowdhury; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  The Inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES Dietary Data in Nutrition and Obesity Research and the Scientific Formulation of National Dietary Guidelines.

Authors:  Edward Archer; Gregory Pavela; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Misreporting of dietary intake affects estimated nutrient intakes in low-income Spanish-speaking women.

Authors:  Jinan C Banna; Marie K Fialkowski; Marilyn S Townsend
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Underreporting of dietary intake by body mass index in premenopausal women participating in the Healthy Women Study.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Park; Jung Sun Lee; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Comparison of self-reported, measured, metabolizable energy intake with total energy expenditure in overweight teens.

Authors:  Rajni Singh; Berdine R Martin; Yvonne Hickey; Dorothy Teegarden; Wayne W Campbell; Bruce A Craig; Dale A Schoeller; Deborah Anne Kerr; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Characteristics of high and low energy reporting teenagers and their relationship to low energy reporting mothers.

Authors:  Karin Vågstrand; Anna Karin Lindroos; Yvonne Linné
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Healthy eating norms and food consumption.

Authors:  W C Wang; A Worsley
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Under-reporting of energy intake in elderly Australian women is associated with a higher body mass index.

Authors:  X Meng; D A Kerr; K Zhu; A Devine; V A Solah; J Wright; C W Binns; R L Prince
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Differences between food group reports of low-energy reporters and non-low-energy reporters on a food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  Amy E Millen; Janet A Tooze; Amy F Subar; Lisa L Kahle; Arthur Schatzkin; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.