Literature DB >> 10484218

A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.

J C Varghese1, M A Farrell, G Courtney, H Osborne, F E Murray, M J Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of biliary tract disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRCP was performed in 100 patients in whom direct cholangiographic correlation (ERCP, n = 98; PTC, n = 9; intraoperative cholangiography, n = 3) was available for comparison. The MRCP examinations were performed using a two-dimensional multi-slice, fast spin echo (FSE) technique and a local surface coil. The diagnoses at direct cholangiography were choledocholithiasis in 30 patients, benign and malignant strictures in 28 patients and normal bile ducts in 42 patients. The nature of the strictures (benign, n = 2; tumour, n = 18; lymphnode recurrence, n = 3; unknown histology, n = 5) was determined by one or more of the following procedures: surgery (n = 8), biopsy (n = 15), cytology (n = 6) and cross-sectional imaging/follow-up findings (n = 3).
RESULTS: MRCP diagnosed choledocholithiasis with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 99% and accuracy of 97 %. It resulted in two false-negative and one false-positive findings when compared with direct cholangiography. MRCP accurately diagnosed the presence and level of strictures in all patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRCP in the detection of bile duct lesions were 97%, 98% and 97%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRCP has a high diagnostic accuracy when compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of bile duct disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10484218     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90848-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].

Authors:  A M Wallnoefer; K A Herrmann; U Beuers; C J Zech; S Gourtsoyianni; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Which imaging modalities should be used for biliary strictures of unknown aetiology?

Authors:  Dirk Domagk; Johannes Wessling; Beate Conrad; Roman Fischbach; Christina Schleicher; Werner Böcker; Norbert Senninger; Achim Heinecke; Walter Heindel; Wolfram Domschke; Torsten Kucharzik
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes.

Authors:  Shahid Malik; Neeraj Kaushik; Asif Khalid; Kathy Bauer; Debra Brody; Adam Slivka; Kevin McGrath
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Daijo Hashimoto
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-10

8.  Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group.

Authors:  Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam Vogel; Robert T Russell; Ilan Maizlin; Denise B Klinkner; Stephanie Polites; Barbara Gaines; Christine Leeper; Stallion Anthony; Megan Waddell; Shawn St Peter; David Juang; Rajan Thakkar; Joseph Drews; Brandon Behrens; Mubeen Jafri; Randall S Burd; Marianne Beaudin; Laurence Carmant; Richard A Falcone; Suzanne Moody; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Contributions of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Gastroenterological Practice: MRIs for GIs.

Authors:  Christopher G Roth; Dina Halegoua-De Marzio; Flavius F Guglielmo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Ki Whang Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.