Literature DB >> 17211694

EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes.

Shahid Malik1, Neeraj Kaushik, Asif Khalid, Kathy Bauer, Debra Brody, Adam Slivka, Kevin McGrath.   

Abstract

The finding of common bile duct (CBD) dilatation on abdominal imaging frequently results in additional testing. It has been our impression that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation of a dilated CBD is a low-yield examination in the setting of normal serum liver enzymes. We therefore sought to evaluate the EUS yield in evaluating CBD dilatation in patients with normal as compared to elevated serum liver enzymes. A retrospective review was performed to identify patients referred for EUS evaluation of a dilated CBD in the absence of obvious pathology on prior imaging. Charts were reviewed for patient symptoms, presence of elevated serum liver enzymes, imaging studies before EUS, and EUS findings. Exclusion criteria included clinical jaundice, known biliary stricture, mass lesion or stone, and previously sphincterotomy and/or stent placement. Forty-seven patients were identified: 32 with normal and 15 with elevated serum liver enzymes. There was no difference in mean CBD diameter between these two groups (8.51 vs. 8.79 mm, p=0.854). Of the entire group, 15 patients had undergone prior magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP); an additional 7 patients had undergone prior endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). EUS findings to explain CBD dilatation were found more commonly in patients with elevated compared with normal serum liver enzymes (53% vs. 6%, p=0.001). Periampullary diverticula and choledocholithiasis were the most common findings; of 32 patients with normal serum liver enzymes, one periampullary diverticulum and one CBD stone were found, respectively. The CBD stone had been missed by prior MRCP examination. Of 15 patients with elevated serum liver enzymes, there were 3 cases of choledocholithiasis, 4 periampullary diverticula, and 1 ampullary tumor. EUS should be the test of choice for further evaluation of CBD dilatation when index imaging is normal. Although the EUS yield is low in cases of biliary dilatation in the setting of normal serum liver enzymes, its preferential use would potentially avoid unnecessary MRCP and ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17211694     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9582-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population.

Authors:  R S Perret; G D Sloop; J A Borne
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Complications of ERCP.

Authors:  J Shawn Mallery; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Jay L Goldstein; William K Hirota; Brian C Jacobson; Jonathan A Leighton; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Varg; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough; Glenn M Eisen; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in evaluation of choledochal dilatation in patients with obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Wei-Xing Chen; Yu Zhang; You-Ming Li; Guo-Qiang Xu; Ying Fang; Shu-Ping Cai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2002-02

4.  Transabdominal sonography of bile ducts.

Authors:  Suhas G Parulekar
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  V de Lédinghen; R Lecesne; J M Raymond; V Gense; M Amouretti; J Drouillard; P Couzigou; C Silvain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  M E Cannon; S L Carpenter; G H Elta; T T Nostrant; M L Kochman; G G Ginsberg; B Stotland; E F Rosato; J B Morris; F Eckhauser; J M Scheiman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.

Authors:  J M Scheiman; R C Carlos; J L Barnett; G H Elta; T T Nostrant; W D Chey; I R Francis; P S Nandi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.

Authors:  Merete Christensen; Peter Matzen; Svend Schulze; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones.

Authors:  S A Norton; D Alderson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  ERCP in patients with periampullary diverticulum.

Authors:  Andrea Rajnakova; Peter M Goh; Sing Shang Ngoi; Seng Gee Lim
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 May-Jun
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of radiologic abnormalities of the liver and biliary tree.

Authors:  Girish Mishra; Jason D Conway
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

2.  Clinical significance and long-term outcome of incidentally found bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Jaryong Jeon; Song Yi Song; Kyu Taek Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Mun Hee Bae; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

4.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Kiichi Tamada; Jun Ushio; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

6.  Efficacy of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of non-opaque choledocholith.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Chuan-Yong Guo; Xuan-Fu Xu; Xing-Peng Wang; Rong Wan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the papilla and the periampullary region.

Authors:  Cecilia Castillo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-08-16

8.  Malignant biliary strictures in patients with a normal bilirubin and/or normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Sarah C Thomasset; David Saunders; Adele Holland; Ashley R Dennison; Giuseppe Garcea
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?

Authors:  Vernon Carriere; Jason Conway; Jerry Evans; Susanne Shokoohi; Girish Mishra
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-01

10.  Double-duct sign in the era of endoscopic ultrasound: the prevalence of occult pancreaticobiliary malignancy.

Authors:  Jonah Cohen; Mandeep S Sawhney; Douglas K Pleskow; Ram Chuttani; Nirav J Patel; Jennifer Sheridan; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.