Literature DB >> 10483948

Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994-1996. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

G T O'Connor1, D J Malenka, H Quinton, J F Robb, M A Kellett, S Shubrooks, W A Bradley, M J Hearne, M W Watkins, D E Wennberg, B Hettleman, D J O'Rourke, P D McGrath, T Ryan, P VerLee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using recent data, we sought to identify risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.
BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately predict the risk of an adverse outcome is important in clinical decision making and for risk adjustment when assessing quality of care. Most clinical prediction rules for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were developed using data collected before the broader use of new interventional devices.
METHODS: Data were collected on 15,331 consecutive hospital admissions by six clinical centers. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Variables associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality included older age, congestive heart failure, peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, increased creatinine levels, lowered ejection fraction, treatment of cardiogenic shock, treatment of an acute myocardial infarction, urgent priority, emergent priority, preprocedure insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump and PCI of a type C lesion. The receiver operating characteristic area for the predicted probability of death was 0.88, indicating a good ability to discriminate. The rule was well calibrated, predicting accurately at all levels of risk. Bootstrapping demonstrated that the estimate was stable and performed well among different patient subsets.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of interventional cardiology, accurate calculation of the risk of in-hospital mortality after a percutaneous coronary intervention is feasible and may be useful for patient counseling and for quality improvement purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10483948     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00267-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Jocelyn M Weiss; Elizabeth R Delong; Eric D Peterson; Sean M O'Brien; Paul Kolm; Lloyd W Klein; Richard E Shaw; Charles McKay; Laura L Ritzenthaler; Jeffrey J Popma; John C Messenger; David M Shahian; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Kirk N Garratt; Issam D Moussa; Fred H Edwards; George D Dangas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge for All Comers after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Ali Hama Amin; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; Peter Farjo; Kinjan Patel; Akram Kawasra; Annina Guzek; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-10-23

3.  Multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England.

Authors:  A D Grayson; R K Moore; M Jackson; S Rathore; S Sastry; T P Gray; I Schofield; A Chauhan; F F Ordoubadi; B Prendergast; R H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention: let's do it!

Authors:  A Siotia; J Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Effects of SVM parameter optimization on discrimination and calibration for post-procedural PCI mortality.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Frederic S Resnic; Nipun Arora; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Elizabeth R DeLong; J Matthew Brennan; Mandeep Singh; Sunil V Rao; Richard E Shaw; Matthew T Roe; Kalon K L Ho; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; William S Weintraub; Ralph G Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance.

Authors:  Sarah E Henrickson Parker; Aaron A Laviana; Rishi K Wadhera; Douglas A Wiegmann; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Comparison of six risk scores in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI: competing factors influence mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Atul M Limaye; Samantha Sartori; Paul Lee; Roshan Patel; Sweta Chandela; Biana Trost; Swathi Roy; Rafael Harari; Birju Narechania; Rucha Karajgikar; Michael C Kim; Prakash Krishnan; Pedro Moreno; Usman Baber; Roxana Mehran; George Dangas; Annapoorna S Kini; Samin K Sharma
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Risk stratification for long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Chuntao Wu; Fabian T Camacho; Spencer B King; Gary Walford; David R Holmes; Nicholas J Stamato; Peter B Berger; Samin Sharma; Jeptha P Curtis; Ferdinand J Venditti; Alice K Jacobs; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.