Literature DB >> 17579868

Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for aliphatic aldehydes as a function of stimulus concentration.

Matthias Laska1, Dipa Joshi, Gordon M Shepherd.   

Abstract

Using an operant conditioning paradigm, we tested the ability of CD-1 mice to discriminate between members of a homologous series of aliphatic aldehydes presented at four different concentrations. We found that the mice were clearly capable of discriminating between all odorant pairs when stimuli were presented at concentrations of 1, 0.01, and 0.001 ppm (corresponding to four, two, and one log unit above the highest individual detection threshold) with no significant difference in performance between these concentrations. In contrast, the animals generally failed to discriminate above chance level when stimuli were presented at 0.0001 ppm (corresponding to the highest individual detection threshold) although stimuli were clearly detectable. Further, we found a significant negative correlation between discrimination performance and structural similarity of odorants in terms of differences in carbon chain length. These findings suggest that an increase in stimulus concentration of only one log unit above detection threshold appears to be sufficient for recruitment of additional subpopulations of odorant receptors to allow for qualitative recognition of aliphatic aldehydes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17579868     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0248-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  33 in total

1.  Discrimination between the enantiomers of carvone and of terpinen-4-ol odorants in normal rats and those with lesions of the olfactory bulbs.

Authors:  Kathleen McBride; Burton Slotnick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Comparative analysis of volatile constituents from mice and their urine.

Authors:  Frank Röck; Sven Mueller; Udo Weimar; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Peter Overath
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory.

Authors:  N Bodyak; B Slotnick
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system.

Authors:  D Lancet; E Sadovsky; E Seidemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Odorant molecular length: one aspect of the olfactory code.

Authors:  B A Johnson; M Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli.

Authors:  Hans U Fried; Stefan H Fuss; Sigrun I Korsching
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Odorant responses of olfactory sensory neurons expressing the odorant receptor MOR23: a patch clamp analysis in gene-targeted mice.

Authors:  Xavier Grosmaitre; Anne Vassalli; Peter Mombaerts; Gordon M Shepherd; Minghong Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.

Authors:  B A Stuck; S Frey; C Freiburg; K Hörmann; T Zahnert; T Hummel
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Hartwig Spors; Alan Carleton; Troy W Margrie; Thomas Kuner; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  2 in total

1.  Olfactory discrimination of aliphatic odorants at 1 ppm: too easy for CD-1 mice to show odor structure-activity relationships?

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Asa Rosandher; Sara Hommen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Olfactory and visuospatial learning and memory performance in two strains of Alzheimer's disease model mice--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Matthew Phillips; Erik Boman; Hanna Osterman; David Willhite; Matthias Laska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.