Literature DB >> 2584039

The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.

V A Kazandjian1, P W Durance, M A Schork.   

Abstract

This article reviews the current small-area variation analysis (SAVA) approach to population-based rates of surgery, and describes a new method for ascertaining variance based on the beta-binomial probability distribution of small-area rates. The critical review of the current SAVA approach focuses (1) on how incidence rates are calculated, and (2) on how the significance of the observed magnitude between the largest and smallest rates (i.e., the external quotient) is ascertained. While reducing the problems of calculating rates by considering only certain operative procedures, the new method addresses the current inadequacies of ascertaining significant differences among small areas. Not only does it correctly assess likelihood of an extermal quotient, it also can determine the particular area's rate, producing an unlikely extermal quotient. The method evaluates the probability that the observed magnitude of the extremal quotient is due solely to chance and study design effects, and tables of these probabilities are available for the method's application. A mathematical model, based on a combination of the binomial and beta distributions, uses (1) the sample size, (2) the average of the areas' rates, (3) the variance among the rates, and (4) a specific quotient level to determine the probability of observing the quotient by chance. After computerizing this calculation, probability tables for reasonable values of these four parameters are generated. In addition to looking at just one quotient for each sample, the probability tables facilitate the easy examination of intermediate quotients when the extremal quotient is unlikely due to chance. By alternatively ignoring the highest and lowest rates, two new quotients can be produced and tested. Given that one of these two quotients is likely due to chance, the excluded rate (i.e., producing the unlikely extremal quotient) can be classified as an outliner, and the associated small area should be the focus of more detailed investigation. The probability tables reveal that the external quotient is not the appropriate statistic to be applied in studies where many small areas are to be included. The probability of seeing even a "large" extremal quotient simply by chance rapidly approaches one as the sample size increases. However, an extremal quotient modeled from a beta-binomial distribution can be useful for studies with small sample sizes (e.g., six counties). The use of this beta-binomial model for small-area rates provides a new method of designing and evaluating small-area studies where costs or domain limit the number of areas under consideration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584039      PMCID: PMC1065591     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

1.  Iowa employers use small area analysis in benefits reform.

Authors:  G McCracken; S Bognanni
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  1986-09

2.  What physicians should know about small area variation analysis.

Authors:  V A Kazandjian; P E Dans; L Scherlis
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1989-06

3.  Medicare patients: geographic differences in hospital discharge rates and multiple stays.

Authors:  M Gornick
Journal:  Soc Secur Bull       Date:  1977-06

4.  Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Does race affect hospital use?

Authors:  P A Wilson; J R Griffith; P J Tedeschi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Geographic variations in the use of services: do they have any clinical significance?

Authors:  R H Brook; K Lohr; M Chassin; J Kosecoff; A Fink; D Solomon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  When surgical rates change. Workload and turnover in Manitoba, 1974-1978.

Authors:  S M Cageorge; L L Roos
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Clinical profiles of hospital discharge rates in local communities.

Authors:  J R Griffith; P A Wilson; R A Wolfe; D P Bischak
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Small-area variations in Iowa hospital utilization.

Authors:  J M Kuder; L K Demlo; J P Curry; S Levey
Journal:  Iowa Med       Date:  1985-05

10.  Regional differences in hospital utilization. How much can be traced to population differences?

Authors:  J R Knickman; A M Foltz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95.

Authors:  P C Coyte; W Young
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Regional variations in health services: various methodological problems].

Authors:  V Koehn; F Paccaud
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1996

3.  Distribution of physicians in Ontario. Where are there too few or too many family physicians and general practitioners?

Authors:  P C Coyte; M Catz; M Stricker
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis.

Authors:  P Diehr; K Cain; F Connell; E Volinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.

Authors:  W D Flanders; C C Shipp; D M FitzGerald; L S Lin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Testing the null hypothesis in small area analysis.

Authors:  K C Cain; P Diehr
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The Effect of Geographic Units of Analysis on Measuring Geographic Variation in Medical Services Utilization.

Authors:  Agnus M Kim; Jong Heon Park; Sungchan Kang; Kyosang Hwang; Taesik Lee; Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-07

8.  Is there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services research.

Authors:  Berta Ibáñez; Julián Librero; Enrique Bernal-Delgado; Salvador Peiró; Beatriz González López-Valcarcel; Natalia Martínez; Felipe Aizpuru
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Measuring the level of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care: The performance of different measures across areas and over time.

Authors:  Tore Hofstad; Jorun Rugkåsa; Solveig O Ose; Olav Nyttingnes; Tonje L Husum
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.035

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.