Literature DB >> 10470193

C-erbB-2, CEA and CA 15.3 serum levels in the early diagnosis of recurrence of breast cancer patients.

R Molina1, J Jo, X Filella, G Zanón, B Farrus, M Muñoz, M L Latre, J Pahisa, M Velasco, P Fernandez, J Estapé, A M Ballesta.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: C-erbB-2, CEA and CA 15.3 serial serum determinations were performed in 250 patients (follow-up: 1-4 years, mean 2.5 years) with primary breast cancer and no evidence of residual disease (NED) after radical treatment (radical mastectomy or simple mastectomy and radiotherapy). Ninety-five patients developed metastases during follow-up.
RESULTS: Abnormal c-erbB-2, CEA and CA 15.3 serum levels (> 20 U/ml, > 10 ng/ml or > 60 U/ml, respectively) prior to diagnosis were found in 28.4%, 31.6% and 46.3% of the 95 patients with recurrence, with a lead time of 4.2 +/- 2.4, 5.0 +/- 2.5 and 4.6 +/- 2.7 months, respectively. One of the tumor markers was the first sign of recurrence in 69.5% of the patients. Tumor marker specificity was 100% with levels lower than the cut-point in all 155 patients without recurrence. Tumor marker sensitivity was clearly related to the site of recurrence, with the lowest sensitivity found in locoregional relapse and the highest in patients with liver or bone metastases. C-erbB-2 sensitivity in early diagnosis was significantly higher in patients with c-erbB-2 overexpression in tissue (10/12, 83.3%) than in those without overexpression (1/34, 2.9%) (p = 0.0001). Likewise, higher levels of both, c-erbB-2 and CA 15.3 at diagnosis of recurrence, higher sensitivity in early diagnosis of relapse and a higher lead time were found in PgR+ patients (CA 15.3) or in PgR- patients (C-erbB-2) (p < 0.015). In conclusion, tumor markers are useful tools for the early diagnosis of metastases, being the first sign of recurrence in 69.5% of patients with relapse (76.3% in patients with metastases).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10470193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  19 in total

1.  The efficacy of Guolin-Qigong on the body-mind health of Chinese women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Jieshu You; Wing T Y Loo; Youzhi Sun; Yanhua He; Huiping Sit; Lei Jia; Meikuen Wong; Zhiyu Xia; Xiao Zheng; Zhiyu Wang; Neng Wang; Lixing Lao; Jianping Chen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Serum HER2/ECD value in stage I and II early breast cancer: need of a lower cut-off?

Authors:  Sasha Badzek; Vesna Lesko Kelovic; Stjepko Plestina; Ines Humar; Zoran Veir; Zeljko Mihaljevic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Development of a novel metastatic breast cancer score based on hyaluronic acid metabolism.

Authors:  Hatem A El-Mezayen; El-Shahat A Toson; Hossam Darwish; Fatheya M Metwally
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; N Lynn Henry; Julie R Gralow; Dana K Mirick; William Barlow; Ruth Etzioni; David Mummy; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Challenges in the clinical utility of the serum test for HER2 ECD.

Authors:  Lian Lam; Nicholas McAndrew; Marla Yee; Ting Fu; Julia C Tchou; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-03

6.  Correlation between bone scintigraphy and tumor markers in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Amela Begić; Elma Kucukalić-Selimović; Nermina Obralić; Osman Durić; Nadir Lacević; A Skopljak
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  Serum HER-2: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for detecting metastatic recurrence in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Patricia Diana Sørensen; Erik Hugger Jakobsen; Jonna Skov Madsen; Eva Brix Petersen; Rikke Fredslund Andersen; Birthe Østergaard; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Is a comparative clinical trial for breast cancer tumor markers to monitor disease recurrence warranted? A value of information analysis.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; Norah Lynn Henry; Scott D Ramsey; David K Blough; Bill Barlow; Julie R Gralow; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 9.  FDG PET and tumour markers in the diagnosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Wulf Siggelkow; Werner Rath; Udalrich Buell; Michael Zimny
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Long-term prognostic study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Uehara; Takayuki Kinoshita; Takashi Hojo; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Eriko Iwamoto; Takashi Fukutomi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.