Literature DB >> 22113445

Serum HER2/ECD value in stage I and II early breast cancer: need of a lower cut-off?

Sasha Badzek1, Vesna Lesko Kelovic, Stjepko Plestina, Ines Humar, Zoran Veir, Zeljko Mihaljevic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HER2 overexpression is well-established risk factor of worse prognosis in metastatic and early breast cancer. HER2 positivity can be determined from tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining or by fluorescent in situ hybridization, or from serum by measuring concentration of HER2 receptor extracellular domain (HER2/ECD). HER2/ECD correlates well with worse prognosis in metastatic and locally advanced (stage III) disease if serum concentration is >15 ng/ml, but there are no consistent data for patients with early breast cancer. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 41 patients with stage I and II breast cancer and 52 healthy controls were included into the study. HER2/ECD was determined before surgery and correlated with HER2/neu overexpression, Ki67, hormone receptor status and disease stage, and compared with value in healthy controls. Mean serum HER2/ECD concentration in patients was 8.62 ng/ml and 5.78 ng/ml in controls, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.000061). The best diagnostic cut-off value was 7.7 ng/ml, with 76.92% sensitivity and 72.92% specificity. Positive predictive value of the test was 69.77% and negative predictive value was 79.55%, with 74.71% of patients correctly classified. Serum HER2/ECD correlated with hormone receptors status, and no correlation with histological overexpression has been observed. CONCLUSION. Serum HER2/ECD concentration of ≥7.7 ng/ml has possible diagnostic value in stage I and II breast cancer. It should not be used as a determinant of HER2 positivity. Prognostic significance of HER2/ECD in early breast cancer, its correlation with hormone receptor status, and interconnection between hormone receptors and HER2 receptor signaling should be further analyzed, since it may have therapeutic implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113445     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-011-0099-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  42 in total

1.  Identification and classification of p53-regulated genes.

Authors:  J Yu; L Zhang; P M Hwang; C Rago; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2004

3.  Are HER1/EGFR interactions with ligand free HER2 related to the effects of HER1-targeted drugs?

Authors:  Sven Kurbel
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Comparison of methods of measuring HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  L N Harris; V Liotcheva; G Broadwater; M J Ramirez; P Maimonis; S Anderson; T Everett; D Harpole; M B Moore; D A Berry; D Rizzeri; J J Vredenburgh; R C Bentley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor is present in human amniotic fluid and breast milk.

Authors:  M P Michalsky; M Lara-Marquez; L Chun; G E Besner
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Association of Smads with lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1/T cell-specific factor mediates cooperative signaling by the transforming growth factor-beta and wnt pathways.

Authors:  E Labbé; A Letamendia; L Attisano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  ErbB2 overexpression on occult metastatic cells in bone marrow predicts poor clinical outcome of stage I-III breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S Braun; G Schlimok; I Heumos; G Schaller; L Riethdorf; G Riethmüller; K Pantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff; Suleiman A Massarweh; Jiang Shou; Lavina Bharwani; Syed K Mohsin; C Kent Osborne
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  C-erb-B2 gene amplification and serum level of c-erb-B2 oncoprotein at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  X Fontana; P Ferrari; M Namer; R Peysson; C Salanon; F Bussiere
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Clinical utility of serum HER2/neu in monitoring and prediction of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-based therapies.

Authors:  Francisco J Esteva; Carol D Cheli; Herbert Fritsche; Monica Fornier; Dennis Slamon; Robert P Thiel; Diana Luftner; Farooq Ghani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  Salivary expression of soluble HER2 in breast cancer patients with positive and negative HER2 status.

Authors:  Fatna Laidi; Amal Bouziane; Amina Lakhdar; Samira Khabouze; Brahim Rhrab; Fatima Zaoui
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Preoperative serum HER2 extracellular domain levels in primary invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Sae Byul Lee; Jong Won Lee; Jong Han Yu; Beom Seok Ko; Hee Jeong Kim; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Hee Jin Lee; Sung-Bae Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Jin-Hee Ahn; Woochang Lee; Joohon Sung; Sei-Hyun Ahn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Elevated serum HER-2 predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer and is correlated to ADAM10 expression.

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Ailing Zhong; Suhong Xie; Yanchun Wang; Jiajun Sun; Jie Zhang; Ying Tong; Miaomiao Chen; Guihong Zhang; Qian Ma; Jinyan Kai; Lin Guo; Renquan Lu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.