Literature DB >> 10469765

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the very low birth weight infant: the Vermont Oxford Network experience.

N N Finer1, J D Horbar, J H Carpenter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The limited literature available to date suggests that the use of delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DR-CPR) is associated with very poor outcomes, especially for extremely low birth weight infants. We reviewed the cumulative experience of the Vermont Oxford Network to determine the actual utilization of DR-CPR and the neonatal outcomes of such infants.
METHODS: A retrospective review of information available in the Vermont Oxford Network Database for the years 1994 to 1996. The data set was collected from 196 neonatal units who participate in the Network (data for infants 401 to 500 g were from 1996 only). Infants were eligible for study if they received DR-CPR defined as the administration of chest compressions and/or epinephrine in the delivery room as noted on the Vermont Oxford Network Database record.
RESULTS: Information regarding survival was available for 27 707 newborns with birth weights from 501 to 1500 g, and 497 infants with birth weights from 401 to 500 g. There were 24 001 (86.6%) survivors. Overall DR-CPR was given to 9.3% of infants from 401 to 500 g and 6% of infants from 501 to 1500 g, 82.1% receiving chest compressions, and 66.7% receiving epinephrine. Survival of infants receiving DR-CPR was 23. 9% for infants of 401 to 500 g, and 63.3% for infants of 501 to 1500 g, compared with 16.7% and 87.9% for infants in these weight groups not receiving DR-CPR. Survival was greater for infants of 501 g or greater without DR-CPR compared with those who received this intervention within each 250-g birth weight subgroup. For infants of <1000 g, survival was 53.8% with DR-CPR compared with 74.9% without. Head ultrasounds were available for 95.5% of all surviving infants and 96.7% of infants who received DR-CPR. Overall, any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) occurred more frequently in infants who received DR-CPR (38%) than in those who did not (21%). Grade 3 or 4 (severe) IVH was seen in 15.3% of infants who received DR-CPR compared with 4.9% of the infants who did not. Overall, survival without severe IVH occurred in 52.2% of DR-CPR infants compared with 81.3% of infants who did not require this intervention.
CONCLUSION: The majority of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants who receive DR-CPR survive, and at least half of such infants who survive do not have evidence of severe IVH. Further follow-up studies are required to determine the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of such infants. The current study does not support the previously noted poor outcome in extremely low birth weight infants who receive DR-CPR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10469765     DOI: 10.1542/peds.104.3.428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  19 in total

1.  Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants who received delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Myra H Wyckoff; Walid A Salhab; Roy J Heyne; Douglas E Kendrick; Barbara J Stoll; Abbot R Laptook
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Chest compressions and epinephrine during resuscitation of infants born at the border of viability: Yes, no or maybe?

Authors:  Gregory P Moore; Thierry Daboval; Kevin W Coughlin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Neonatal resuscitation of extremely low birthweight infants: a survey of practice in Italy.

Authors:  D Trevisanuto; N Doglioni; P Ferrarese; R Bortolus; V Zanardo
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Survival after delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A national registry study.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Foglia; Erik A Jensen; Myra H Wyckoff; Taylor Sawyer; Alexis Topjian; Sarah J Ratcliffe
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Delivery Room Resuscitation and Short-Term Outcomes in Moderately Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Monika Bajaj; Girija Natarajan; Seetha Shankaran; Myra Wyckoff; Abbot R Laptook; Edward F Bell; Barbara J Stoll; Waldemar A Carlo; Betty R Vohr; Shampa Saha; Krisa P Van Meurs; Pablo J Sanchez; Carl T D'Angio; Rosemary D Higgins; Abhik Das; Nancy Newman; Michele C Walsh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  Tackling Quality Improvement in the Delivery Room.

Authors:  Wannasiri Lapcharoensap; Henry C Lee
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.430

7.  Delivery room resuscitation and adverse outcomes among very low birth weight preterm infants.

Authors:  S Arnon; T Dolfin; B Reichman; R H Regev; L Lerner-Geva; V Boyko; I Litmanovitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Outcomes of neonates born at <26 weeks gestational age who receive extensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with airway and breathing support.

Authors:  Vivek Shukla; Omar Elkhateeb; Prakesh S Shah; Junmin Yang; Kyong-Soon Lee
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 9.  Current Challenges in Neonatal Resuscitation: What is the Role of Adrenaline?

Authors:  Roberto Antonucci; Luca Antonucci; Cristian Locci; Annalisa Porcella; Laura Cuzzolin
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Resuscitation intensity at birth is associated with changes in brain metabolic development in preterm neonates.

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Meisan Brown-Lum; Vann Chau; Kenneth J Poskitt; Ruth E Grunau; Anne Synnes; Steven P Miller
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.