Literature DB >> 10463046

Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs: exploring the equivalence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

C Bourgault1, E Elstein, J Le Lorier, S Suissa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reference-based pricing is a cost-containment policy applied to prescription drugs that are in the same class and deemed to be therapeutically equivalent. Recent reference-based pricing measures have targeted several drug classes, including angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The objective of this study was to assess whether patients treated for hypertension with various ACE inhibitors differed in their utilization of health care services and hence, whether the various ACE inhibitors should be considered therapeutically equivalent.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort was formed from 4709 Saskatchewan residents aged 40-79 years who initiated treatment for hypertension with 1 of the 3 most frequently prescribed ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril or lisinopril) between Jan. 1, 1991, and Dec. 31, 1993. Information obtained from universal insurance databases included prescription drug use, the number of visits to a general practitioner (GP) or specialist and the number of hospital admissions during the year before treatment was initiated and during a follow-up period of up to 4 years. Rates were statistically adjusted for potential confounding variables and compared across treatment groups.
RESULTS: Of the 4709 patients, 529 were prescribed captopril initially, 2939 enalapril and 1241 lisinopril. After treatment was initiated patients prescribed captopril were dispensed more medications on average, with an overall rate of 18.6 prescriptions per patient per year (v. 16.4 and 14.7 for enalapril and lisinopril users respectively); they were admitted to hospital more often, and they made more visits to GPs and specialists. The adjusted rate ratio of the number of visits to a GP for patients receiving enalapril, relative to captopril, was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.88), and for those receiving lisinopril it was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.83). The adjusted rate ratios for the number of visits to a specialist were similar but lower, and for the number of hospital admissions they were 0.82 for patients prescribed enalapril initially (95% CI 0.73-0.93) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.75) for those prescribed lisinopril.
INTERPRETATION: Patients with hypertension who are initially prescribed captopril used health care services more than those initially prescribed enalapril or lisinopril. This suggests that ACE inhibitors may not be therapeutically equivalent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10463046      PMCID: PMC1230501     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  41 in total

1.  Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  A Whelton; B Dunne; N Glazer; J B Kostis; W E Miller; D J Rector; O N Tresznewsky
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Economic impact of cost-containment strategies in third party programmes in the US (part I).

Authors:  C E Reeder; E W Lingle; R M Schulz; R P Mauch; B S Nightengale; C A Pedersen; M L Watrous; S E Zetzl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.

Authors:  R J Rubin; D N Mendelson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Recent public policies in The Netherlands to control pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement.

Authors:  H Rigter
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Clinical and economic effects of replacing enalapril with benazepril in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  T A Briscoe; C J Dearing
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

6.  Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs.

Authors:  P R McLaughlin
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  Formulary management of ACE inhibitors.

Authors:  K R Gerbrandt; K C Yedinak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Improving physician prescribing practices: bridge over troubled waters.

Authors:  S M MacLeod
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Differences in the acute and chronic antihypertensive effects of lisinopril and enalapril assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  S Gourlay; J McNeil; A Forbes; B McGrath
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.749

Review 10.  Critical assessment of ACE inhibitors. Part 2.

Authors:  L G Howes
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical policies in Canada: another example of federal-provincial discord.

Authors:  A H Anis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Why is calling an ACE an ACE so controversial? Evaluating reference-based pricing in British Columbia.

Authors:  Aslam Anis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Reference-based pricing schemes: effect on pharmaceutical expenditure, resource utilisation and health outcomes.

Authors:  Lisa L Ioannides-Demos; Joseph E Ibrahim; John J McNeil
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Impact of reference-based pricing of nitrates on the use and costs of anti-anginal drugs.

Authors:  P V Grootendorst; L R Dolovich; B J O'Brien; A M Holbrook; A R Levy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Impact of reference-based pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on drug utilization.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Stephen B Soumerai; Robert J Glynn; Malcolm Maclure; Colin Dormuth; Alexander M Walker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Does knowledge of medication prices predict physicians' support for cost effective prescribing policies.

Authors:  Jennifer M Polinski; Malcolm Maclure; Blair Marshall; Alan Cassels; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Amanda R Patrick; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Can J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-19

7.  Clinical and economic consequences of a reimbursement restriction of nebulised respiratory therapy in adults: direct comparison of randomised and observational evaluations.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Malcolm Maclure; Bruce Carleton; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.