Literature DB >> 10164060

Formulary management of ACE inhibitors.

K R Gerbrandt1, K C Yedinak.   

Abstract

An increasing number of ACE inhibitors have become available in recent years. Because these agents are all similar, careful scrutiny is required in order to determine specific advantages of particular agents when making formulary decisions. Differences between agents with regard to structure and tissue specificity have been identified, but the clinical relevance of these differences is not clear. ACE inhibitors vary greatly with regard to bioconversion, distribution and elimination. Disease states such as congestive heart failure (CHF) and hepatic or renal insufficiency may affect the disposition of specific ACE inhibitors. These agents may differ substantially in duration of action, and ACE inhibitors that are given once daily may optimise patient compliance and decrease costs. ACE inhibitors have been extensively studied in patients with hypertension, CHF or nephropathy, and following myocardial infarction (MI). Differences in efficacy between agents are often a result of variations in study design, or because nonequipotent dosages were compared. It is likely that the benefits of ACE inhibitors are class effects, and it is probably reasonable to use an agent even if large scale clinical trials have not been performed with that particular drug. Few differences have been found between ACE inhibitors with regard to adverse effects or drug interactions, and these factors are of minor importance when making formulary decisions. Cost and availability may vary among agents, and will depend on geographical location and institution-specific purchasing contracts. ACE inhibitors have shown positive effects on quality of life when compared with agents of other classes. Quality-of-life studies that have directly compared ACE inhibitors have produced conflicting results. In the setting of hypertension, cost-effectiveness evaluations typically find that the newer, longer-acting ACE inhibitors provide the greatest financial benefit. Differences in cost effectiveness in the post-MI patient population are typically the result of variations in protocol design, including duration of treatment and nondrug costs. ACE inhibitors are fairly homogeneous and selection between agents can be difficult. Clinical efficacy, time course of action, and cost are the primary concerns in selecting agents for inclusion on a formulary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10164060     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199610060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  86 in total

1.  ACE inhibition improves insulin-sensitivity in aged insulin-resistant hypertensive patients.

Authors:  G Paolisso; A Gambardella; M Verza; A D'Amore; S Sgambato; M Varricchio
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. A review of the literature and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Lisinopril. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  S G Lancaster; P A Todd
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Differentiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors by their selective inhibition of ACE in physiologically important target organs.

Authors:  D W Cushman; F L Wang; W C Fung; C M Harvey; J M DeForrest
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Cost of switching hypertensive patients from enalapril maleate to lisinopril.

Authors:  E M Lindgren-Furmaga; A A Schuna; N L Wolff; T L Goodfriend
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1991-02

6.  The neurohormonal hypothesis: a theory to explain the mechanism of disease progression in heart failure.

Authors:  M Packer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  The effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on mortality and morbidity after anterior myocardial infarction. The Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Evaluation (SMILE) Study Investigators.

Authors:  E Ambrosioni; C Borghi; B Magnani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Differences in structure of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors might predict differences in action.

Authors:  A G Herman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-10-08       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Double blind controlled study of low dose intravenous perindoprilat or enalaprilat infusion in elderly patients with heart failure.

Authors:  R J MacFadyen; K R Lees; J L Reid
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-04

10.  Left ventricular remodelling, neurohormonal activation and early treatment with enalapril (CONSENSUS II) following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Sigurdsson; K Swedberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of Modified System of Objectified Judgement Analysis (SOJA) methodology on prescribing costs of ACE inhibitors.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alabbadi; Grainne Crealey; Michael Scott; Simon Baird; Tom Trouton; Jill Mairs; James McElnay
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in assessing and selecting congestive heart failure therapies.

Authors:  Emile Levy; Pierre Levy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Perindopril: an updated review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  M Hurst; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Reference-based pricing of prescription drugs: exploring the equivalence of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  C Bourgault; E Elstein; J Le Lorier; S Suissa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Cost-effective strategies in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rippin; Anthony H Barnett; Stephen C Bain
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Are cholesterol-lowering medications and antihypertensive agents preventing stroke in ways other than by controlling the risk factor?

Authors:  Sean Ruland; Philip B Gorelick
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Are cholesterol-lowering medications and antihypertensive agents preventing stroke in ways other than by controlling the risk factor?

Authors:  Sean Ruland; Philip B Gorelick
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.081

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.