Literature DB >> 11944760

Impact of reference-based pricing for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on drug utilization.

Sebastian Schneeweiss1, Stephen B Soumerai, Robert J Glynn, Malcolm Maclure, Colin Dormuth, Alexander M Walker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing copayments for higher-priced prescription medications has been suggested as a means to help finance drug coverage for elderly patients, but evaluations of the impact of such policies are rare. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of reference-based pricing of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on drug utilization, cost savings and potential substitution with other medication classes.
METHODS: We analyzed 36 months of claims data from British Columbia for 2 years before and 1 year after implementation of reference-based pricing (in January 1997). The 119,074 patients were community-living Pharmacare beneficiaries 65 years of age or older who used ACE inhibitors during the study period. The main outcomes were changes over time in use of ACE inhibitors, use of antihypertensive drugs and expenditures for antihypertensive drugs, as well as predictors of medication switching related to reference-based pricing.
RESULTS: We observed a sharp decline (29%) in the use of higher-priced cost-shared ACE inhibitors immediately after implementation of the policy (p < 0.001). After a transition period, the post-implementation utilization rate for all ACE inhibitors was 11% lower than projected from pre-implementation data. However, overall utilization of antihypertensives was unchanged (p = 0.40). The policy saved $6.7 million in pharmaceutical expenditures during its first 12 months. Patients with heart failure or diabetes mellitus who were taking a cost-shared ACE inhibitor were more likely to remain on the same medication after implementation of reference-based pricing (OR 1.12 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.06-1.19] and 1.28 [95% CI 1.20-1.36] respectively). Patients with low-income status were more likely than those with high-income status to stop all antihypertensive therapy (OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.43-1.89]), which reflects a general trend toward discontinuation of therapy among these patients even before implementation of reference-based pricing.
INTERPRETATION: Reference-based pricing in British Columbia achieved a sustained reduction in drug expenditures, and no changes in overall use of antihypertensive therapy were observed. Further research is needed on the overall health and economic effects of such policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11944760      PMCID: PMC99452     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  47 in total

Review 1.  The Medicare prescription drug benefit: how will the game be played?

Authors:  H A Huskamp; M B Rosenthal; R G Frank; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Copayments for ambulatory care: penny-wise and pound-foolish.

Authors:  M I Roemer; C E Hopkins; L Carr; F Gartside
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  On the evaluation of drug benefits policy changes with longitudinal claims data: the policy maker's versus the clinician's perspective.

Authors:  S Schneeweiss; M Maclure; A M Walker; P Grootendorst; S B Soumerai
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons.

Authors:  R Tamblyn; R Laprise; J A Hanley; M Abrahamowicz; S Scott; N Mayo; J Hurley; R Grad; E Latimer; R Perreault; P McLeod; A Huang; P Larochelle; L Mallet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension. Task Force for the Development of the 1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N Campbell; P Larochelle; P Bolli; E D Burgess; S G Carruthers; J S Floras; R B Haynes; G Honos; F H Leenen; L A Leiter; A G Logan; M G Myers; J D Spence; K B Zarnke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The differential impact of copayment on drug use in a Medicaid population.

Authors:  C E Reeder; A A Nelson
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  The effect of a Medicaid drug copayment program on the utilization and cost of prescription services.

Authors:  A A Nelson; C E Reeder; W M Dickson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care.

Authors:  D Gillings; D Makuc; E Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Psychosocial factors influence control of moderate and severe hypertension.

Authors:  J R Caldwell; V Theisen; C A Kaunisto; P J Reddy; P S Smythe; D W Smith
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  31 in total

1.  Why is calling an ACE an ACE so controversial? Evaluating reference-based pricing in British Columbia.

Authors:  Aslam Anis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Pharmaceutical cost containment with reference-based pricing: time for refinements.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Malcolm Maclure; Colin Dormuth; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Reference drug pricing.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Stephen B Soumerai; Malcolm Maclure
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Rethinking prescribing in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew Ellner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-13

Review 5.  Reference-based pricing schemes: effect on pharmaceutical expenditure, resource utilisation and health outcomes.

Authors:  Lisa L Ioannides-Demos; Joseph E Ibrahim; John J McNeil
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Effects of reference pricing in pharmaceutical markets: a review.

Authors:  Matteo Maria Galizzi; Simone Ghislandi; Marisa Miraldo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Drug insurance utilization management policies and "reference pricing": an illustrated commentary on the article by Vittorio Maio and colleagues.

Authors:  Malcolm Maclure
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Reference drug programs: effectiveness and policy implications.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  A cross-national study of the persistence of antihypertensive medication use in the elderly.

Authors:  Boris L G van Wijk; William H Shrank; Olaf H Klungel; Sebastian Schneeweiss; M Alan Brookhart; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Reform of prescription drug reimbursement and pricing in the German social health insurance market: a comparison of three scenarios.

Authors:  Stefan Gress; Dea Niebuhr; Uwe May; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.