Literature DB >> 10461295

Defibrillation thresholds are increased by right-sided implantation of totally transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

P A Friedman1, M J Rasmussen, S Grice, J Trusty, M Glikson, M S Stanton.   

Abstract

Whether an ICD is placed via a left- or right-sided approach depends on venous access, the presence of a preexisting pacemaker, and other factors. Since the DFT is affected by lead position, which in turn is determined in part by the side of access, right-sided venous access could adversely affect DFTs. Furthermore, right-sided active can placement directs electric current toward the right hemithorax, which could further increase DFTs. This study sought to determine whether DFTs were increased by right-sided vascular access, and whether active can technology was beneficial or detrimental with right-sided ICD placement. Stepdown to failure DFTs were found in 290 patients receiving transvenous systems at the time of initial ICD implantation. Of these, 271 (93%) received left-sided systems and 19 (7%) received right-sided systems. The mean DFT in systems placed via left-sided vascular access was 11.3 +/- 5.3 J versus 17.0 +/- 4.9 J for right-sided implantation (P < 0.0001); right-sided DFTs were elevated for both active can and cold can systems. Right-sided active can devices had a lower DFT than right-sided cold can systems (15 +/- 4.1 J vs 19 +/- 4.8 J, P = 0.05). The right-sided implantation of implantable defibrillators results in significantly higher DFTs than the left-sided approach. This may be due to the less favorable distribution of the defibrillating field relative to the myocardium with the devices on the right. When right-sided implantation is clinically mandated, active can devices result in lower thresholds and should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10461295     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00599.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

Review 1.  Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jörg Neuzner; Jörg Carlsson
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 3: Results and indications in patients with an ICD.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Periprocedural considerations during implantation of ICD in a patient with Dextrocardia.

Authors:  Farid Aliyev; Cengizhan Turkoglu; Isil Uzunhasan; Cengiz Celiker
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07

4.  A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex.

Authors:  Michael Mollerus; Margaret Lipinski; Thomas Munger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 1.900

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.