Literature DB >> 10460221

A comparison of DNA damage in testicular and proximal epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia.

E K Steele1, N McClure, R J Maxwell, S E Lewis.   

Abstract

Testicular and epididymal spermatozoa are used routinely for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to treat men with obstructive azoospermia. Little is known of the effects of obstruction and stasis on the DNA of these spermatozoa, particularly in the epididymis where spermatozoa have been retained for long periods. Surgical epididymal aspiration for ICSI could provide spermatozoa that are senescent or dying. Using the Comet assay, the percentage of undamaged DNA of testicular spermatozoa from 20 men with obstructive azoospermia was significantly better (83.0 +/- 1. 2%) than from proximal epididymal spermatozoa (75.4 +/- 2.3%; P < 0. 05). There was no difference between the percentage of undamaged DNA of testicular spermatozoa from 39 men with obstructive azoospermia (84.0 +/- 0.9) or from 10 fertile men at vasectomy (86.8 +/- 1.8) or from ejaculated spermatozoa from five of the controls (78.9 +/- 3.9; P > 0.05). In nine subjects, a second biopsy was carried out 6 months later. There was no significant difference in undamaged DNA on these two occasions (83.5 +/- 5.6 and 84.1 +/- 4.2; P > 0.05). This confirms the reproducibility of the Comet assay for non-ejaculated spermatozoa. Our data suggest that testicular sperm DNA appears to be significantly less damaged than epididymal sperm DNA, and so testicular spermatozoa should be used in preference for ICSI to treat men with obstructive azoospermia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10460221     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/5.9.831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  10 in total

1.  Severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermias, secretory and obstructive azoospermias: motility as a criterion of sperm viability.

Authors:  I Molina; J Alfonso; C C Duque; L García-Reboll; M Pérez-Camps; A Romeu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

Review 3.  Impact of Inflammation on Male Reproductive Tract.

Authors:  Alfred Azenabor; Ayodele Oloruntoba Ekun; Oluyemi Akinloye
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  The paternal genome and the health of the assisted reproductive technology child.

Authors:  Sheena E M Lewis; Kishlay Kumar
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maartje Cissen; Madelon van Wely; Irma Scholten; Steven Mansell; Jan Peter de Bruin; Ben Willem Mol; Didi Braat; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with high sperm DNA fragmentation: a SWOT analysis.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Integrating surgical and clinical andrology is essential to improve the quality of care delivered to infertile couples.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

8.  Testicular versus ejaculated sperm should be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in cases of infertility associated with sperm DNA fragmentation | Opinion: Yes.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  A systematic review on sperm DNA fragmentation in male factor infertility: Laboratory assessment.

Authors:  Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-01-17

Review 10.  Extended indications for sperm retrieval: summary of current literature.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-12-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.