Literature DB >> 10457582

Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating.

M E Majd1, M Vadhva, R T Holt.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A preliminary outcome assessment study of titanium cage implants with anterior cervical plating in anterior cervical reconstruction.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using titanium cage implants and anterior plating in cervical reconstruction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior decompression and interbody fusion is a widely accepted surgical treatment for patients with cervical spondylosis. Tricortical iliac crest autograft has been the gold standard but is associated with morbidity at the bone graft donor site, whereas allograft fibula is associated with pseudarthrosis. Problems such as pseudarthrosis, graft collapse, and extrusion still persist with the accepted method of harvesting and implanting bone autografts.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients were treated by channel corpectomy followed by placement of a titanium cage packed with autogenous bone graft from the vertebral bodies to reconstruct the anterior column. An anterior cervical plate was added in 30 of 34 cases that involved decompression of two or more levels. The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 56 months, with an average follow-up period of 32 months, and included examination and radiography.
RESULTS: Six months after surgery, there was radiographic evidence of fusion in 97% of the patients. Eighty-eight percent of the patients (30 of 34) did not experience any complications (neither cage dislodgment nor hardware failure). Four patients had complications that included pseudarthrosis (1), extruded cage (1), cage in kyphosis (1), and radiculopathy (1).
CONCLUSIONS: Titanium cages provide immediate strong anterior column support with minimum hardware complications and avoid bone graft-site morbidity. Titanium cages, with concomitant use of anterior plating, offer an effective and safe alternative to bone autografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457582     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908010-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  47 in total

Review 1.  Anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P W Pavlov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Biodegradable cage. Osteointegration in spondylodesis of the sheep cervical spine].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; M Scholz; S Gumnior; C Krall; P Schleicher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization.

Authors:  Christina M Sayama; Meic H Schmidt; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Jianxin Wu; Dan Luo; Xiaojian Ye; Xuyao Luo; Lisheng Yan; Haiping Qian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Lian; Jian-Guang Xu; Bing-Fang Zeng; Wei Zhou; Wei-Qing Kong; Tie-Sheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical study of a hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Gu; Lian-Shun Jia; Tong-Yi Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Qi Chen; Limin Liu; Yueming Song; Qingquan Kong; Jiancheng Zeng; Youdi Xue; Chunpeng Ren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Xiao Yu; Shuangli Zhou; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.