Literature DB >> 10457570

The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.

B Bai1, L M Jazrawi, F J Kummer, J M Spivak.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study comparing two materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies and vertebral bodies after compression fracture.
OBJECTIVES: To compare an injected, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute with injected polymethylmethacrylate bone cement for strengthening osteoporotic vertebral bodies and improving the integrity of vertebral compression fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Injection of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement into fractured vertebral bodies has been used clinically. However, there is concern about thermal damage to the neural elements during polymerization of the polymethylmethacrylate bone cement as well as its negative effects on bone remodeling. Biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitutes have been studied for enhancement of fixation in fractured vertebrae.
METHODS: Forty fresh osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebrae were used for two separate parts of this study: 1) injection into osteoporotic vertebrae: intact control (n = 8), calcium phosphate (n = 8), and polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (n = 8) groups. Each specimen then was loaded in anterior compression until failure; 2) injection into postfractured vertebrae: calcium phosphate (n = 8) and polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (n = 8) groups. Before and after injection, the specimens were radiographed in the lateral projection to determine changes in vertebral body height and then loaded to failure in anterior bending.
RESULTS: For intact osteoporotic vertebrae, the average fracture strength was 527 +/- 43 N (stiffness, 84 +/- 11 N/mm), 1063 +/- 127 N (stiffness, 157 +/- 21 N/mm) for the group injected with calcium phosphate, and 1036 +/- 100 N (stiffness, 156 +/- 8 N/mm) for the group injected with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. The fracture strength and stiffness in the calcium phosphate bone substitute group and those in the polymethylmethacrylate bone cement group were similar and significantly stronger than those in intact control group (P < 0.05). For the compression fracture study, anterior vertebral height was increased 58.5 +/- 4.6% in the group injected with calcium phosphate and 58.0 +/- 6.5% in the group injected with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement as compared with preinjection fracture heights. No significant difference between the two groups was found in anterior vertebral height, fracture strength, or stiffness.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the injection of a biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute to strengthen osteoporotic vertebral bodies or improve vertebral compression fractures might provide an alternative to the use of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457570     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Vertebroplasty Using Calcium Triglyceride Bone Cement (Kryptonite™) for Vertebral Compression Fractures. A Single-Centre Preliminary Study of Outcomes at One-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Gianluigi Guarnieri; Mario Tecame; Roberto Izzo; Pasquale Vassallo; Angela Sardaro; Francesca Iasiello; Carlo Cavaliere; Mario Muto
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Synthesis of injectable and cohesive nano hydroxyapatite scaffolds.

Authors:  Nitin Pratap Varma; Subhadra Garai; Arvind Sinha
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  [Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].

Authors:  M Arabmotlagh; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Does mixing affect the setting of injectable bone cement? An ultrasound study.

Authors:  M D Vlad; R Torres; J López; M Barracó; J A Moreno; Enrique Fernández
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-12

7.  Respiratory effects, hemodynamic changes and cement leakage during multilevel cement balloon kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Pavlos Katonis; Alexander Hadjipavlou; Xenia Souvatzis; Michael Tzermiadianos; Kalliopi Alpantaki; James Walt Simmons
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  An injectable calcium phosphate-alginate hydrogel-umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell paste for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Treatment of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with kyphoplasty and short pedicle screw fixation: Transpedicular intracorporeal grafting with calcium phosphate: A prospective study.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Petsinis George
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Injectable, biomechanically robust, biodegradable and osseointegrative bone cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Huiling Liu; Bin Liu; Chunxia Gao; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang; Haiyang Yu; Lei Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.