Literature DB >> 10453726

Cremophor reduces paclitaxel penetration into bladder wall during intravesical treatment.

I Knemeyer1, M G Wientjes, J L Au.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously shown that paclitaxel, when dissolved in water and instilled into the bladder, readily penetrates the urothelium. The FDA-approved formulation uses Cremophor and ethanol to dissolve paclitaxel. In the present study, the effects of this solvent system on the urine, bladder tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetics of intravesical paclitaxel were evaluated.
METHODS: Plasma, urine, and tissue pharmacokinetics were determined in five dogs treated for 120 min with paclitaxel (500 microg per 20 ml of 0.22% w/v Cremophor and 0.21% v/v ethanol) by intravesical instillation. Equilibrium dialysis was used to determine the free fraction of paclitaxel and the presence of Cremophor micelles was verified using a fluorescent probe method.
RESULTS: The average bladder tissue concentration was > 1600-fold higher than the plasma concentration. Comparison of the results for paclitaxel dissolved in Cremophor/ethanol with our previous results of paclitaxel dissolved in water (500 microg per 20 ml) indicates that Cremophor/ethanol decreased the paclitaxel partition across the urothelium and reduced the average bladder tissue concentration by 75%, but did not alter the rate of paclitaxel penetration across the bladder wall, the urine pharmacokinetics or the plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. For Cremophor, the urine concentrations during the 120-min treatment ranged from 0.12% to 0.22%, and the concentration in bladder tissue from 0.00004% to 0.0009%. The threshold Cremophor concentration for micelle formation was 0.008%. We found that ethanol at concentrations up to 1% and Cremophor at concentrations below 0.01% did not alter the free fraction of paclitaxel, whereas Cremophor at higher concentrations, i.e. 0.065% and 0.25%, significantly reduced the free fraction by two- to six-fold, respectively. These results indicate that during intravesical instillation of the FDA-approved paclitaxel formulation, the concentration of Cremophor in urine was sufficient to form micelles, resulting in sequestration of paclitaxel into micelles, reduction in the free fraction of paclitaxel and consequently a reduction in paclitaxel penetration across the urothelium. In contrast, the Cremophor concentrations in bladder tissue were inadequate to form micelles and thus did not alter the drug penetration through the bladder tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that intravesical paclitaxel treatment using the FDA-approved formulation provides a significant bladder tissue targeting advantage, although the advantage is lower than when paclitaxel is dissolved in water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10453726     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  17 in total

Review 1.  Role of formulation vehicles in taxane pharmacology.

Authors:  L van Zuylen; J Verweij; A Sparreboom
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Nanotechnology in bladder cancer: current state of development and clinical practice.

Authors:  Ben Tomlinson; Tzu-yin Lin; Marc Dall'Era; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 3.  Drug delivery systems for intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Gaurav Bajaj; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew S Mikhail; Ayele H Negussie; William F Pritchard; Dieter Haemmerich; David Woods; Ivane Bakhutashvili; Juan Esparza-Trujillo; Sam J Brancato; John Karanian; Piyush K Agarwal; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Paclitaxel gelatin nanoparticles for intravesical bladder cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Teng-Kuang Yeh; Jie Wang; Ling Chen; Greg Lyness; Yan Xin; M Guillaume Wientjes; Valerie Bergdall; Guillermo Couto; Francisco Alvarez-Berger; Carrie E Kosarek; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Albert J ten Tije; Jaap Verweij; Walter J Loos; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Targeted delivery of albumin bound paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Di Costanzo; Silvia Gasperoni; Virginia Rotella; Federica Di Costanzo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  A phase I study of a 2-day lapatinib chemosensitization pulse preceding nanoparticle albumin-bound Paclitaxel for advanced solid malignancies.

Authors:  Amy J Chien; Julie A Illi; Andrew H Ko; Wolfgang M Korn; Lawrence Fong; Lee-may Chen; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Charles J Ryan; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Sarita Dubey; Eric J Small; Thierry M Jahan; Nola M Hylton; Benjamin M Yeh; Yong Huang; Kevin M Koch; Mark M Moasser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Human jejunal permeability of cyclosporin A: influence of surfactants on P-glycoprotein efflux in Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  Yu-Yuan Chiu; Kazutaka Higaki; Brien L Neudeck; Jeffrey L Barnett; Lynda S Welage; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Effects of carrier on disposition and antitumor activity of intraperitoneal Paclitaxel.

Authors:  Max Tsai; Ze Lu; Jie Wang; Teng-Kuang Yeh; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.