Literature DB >> 17447121

Effects of carrier on disposition and antitumor activity of intraperitoneal Paclitaxel.

Max Tsai1, Ze Lu, Jie Wang, Teng-Kuang Yeh, M Guillaume Wientjes, Jessie L-S Au.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The rationale for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is to expose peritoneal tumors to high drug concentrations. While multiple phase III trials have established the significant survival advantage by adding IP therapy to intravenous therapy in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients, the use of IP chemotherapy is limited by the complications associated with indwelling catheters and by the local chemotherapy-related toxicity. The present study evaluated the effects of drug carrier on the disposition and efficacy of IP paclitaxel, for identifying strategies for further development of IP treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three paclitaxel formulations, i.e., Cremophor micelles, Cremophor-free paclitaxel-loaded gelatin nanoparticles and polymeric microparticles, were evaluated for peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity in mice after IP injection. Whole body autoradiography and scanning electron microscopy were used to visualize the spatial drug distribution in tissues. A kinetic model, depicting the multiple processes involved in the peritoneal-to-plasma transfer of paclitaxel and its carriers, was established to determine the mechanisms by which a drug carrier alters the peritoneal targeting advantage.
RESULTS: Autoradiographic results indicated that IP injection yielded much higher paclitaxel concentrations in intestinal tissues relative to intravenous injection. Compared to the Cremophor and nanoparticle formulations, the microparticles showed slower drug clearance from the peritoneal cavity, slower absorption into the systemic circulation, longer residence time, 10- to 45-times greater peritoneal targeting advantage and approximately 2-times longer increase in survival time (p < 0.01 for all parameters).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the important roles of drug carrier in determining the peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity of IP treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17447121      PMCID: PMC2774739          DOI: 10.1007/s11095-007-9298-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  33 in total

1.  Cremophor reduces paclitaxel penetration into bladder wall during intravesical treatment.

Authors:  I Knemeyer; M G Wientjes; J L Au
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of the taxanes.

Authors:  C M Kearns
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mark Harries; Paul Ellis; Peter Harper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Sergei Tjulandin; Neville Davidson; Heather Shaw; Neil Desai; Paul Bhar; Michael Hawkins; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A comparative study of intraperitoneal carboplatin versus intravenous carboplatin with intravenous cyclophosphamide in both arms as initial chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Polyzos; N Tsavaris; C Kosmas; L Giannikos; M Katsikas; N Kalahanis; G Karatzas; K Christodoulou; K Giannakopoulos; D Stamatiadis; N Katsilambros
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Formulating paclitaxel in nanoparticles alters its disposition.

Authors:  Teng Kuang Yeh; Ze Lu; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Paclitaxel-loaded gelatin nanoparticles for intravesical bladder cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Teng-Kuang Yeh; Max Tsai; Jessie L-S Au; M Guill Wientjes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Absorption characteristics of model compounds from the small intestinal serosal surface and a comparison with other organ surfaces.

Authors:  Koyo Nishida; Akiko Kuma; Shintaro Fumoto; Mikiro Nakashima; Hitoshi Sasaki; Junzo Nakamura
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.765

9.  Isocratic high-performance liquid chromatographic assay of taxol in biological fluids and tissues using automated column switching.

Authors:  D Song; J L Au
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl       Date:  1995-01-20

10.  Pharmacological effects of 5-fluorouracil microspheres on peritoneal carcinomatosis in animals.

Authors:  A Hagiwara; T Takahashi; K Sawai; C Sakakura; H Tsujimoto; T Imanishi; M Ohgaki; J Yamazaki; S Muranishi; A Yamamoto; T Fujita
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Improving delivery and efficacy of nanomedicines in solid tumors: role of tumor priming.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Ze Lu; Yue Gao; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Antitumour efficacy of two paclitaxel formulations for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in an in vivo rat model.

Authors:  Wim Bouquet; Steven Deleye; Steven Staelens; Lieselotte De Smet; Nancy Van Damme; Isabelle Debergh; Wim P Ceelen; Filip De Vos; Jean Paul Remon; Chris Vervaet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A self-assembling nanoparticle for paclitaxel delivery in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kai Xiao; Juntao Luo; Wiley L Fowler; Yuanpei Li; Joyce S Lee; Li Xing; R Holland Cheng; Li Wang; Kit S Lam
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Tumor-mesoporous silica nanoparticle interactions following intraperitoneal delivery for targeting peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  Derek Hargrove; Brian Liang; Raana Kashfi-Sadabad; Gaurav N Joshi; Laura Gonzalez-Fajardo; Sterling Glass; Michael Jay; Andrew Salner; Xiuling Lu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Improved i.p. drug delivery with bioadhesive nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yang Deng; Fan Yang; Emiliano Cocco; Eric Song; Junwei Zhang; Jiajia Cui; Muneeb Mohideen; Stefania Bellone; Alessandro D Santin; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Competition of charge-mediated and specific binding by peptide-tagged cationic liposome-DNA nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Emily Wonder; Lorena Simón-Gracia; Pablo Scodeller; Ramsey N Majzoub; Venkata Ramana Kotamraju; Kai K Ewert; Tambet Teesalu; Cyrus R Safinya
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Tumor priming enhances siRNA delivery and transfection in intraperitoneal tumors.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Ze Lu; Bertrand Z Yeung; M Guillaume Wientjes; David J Cole; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Multiscale tumor spatiokinetic model for intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Jessie L-S Au; Peng Guo; Yue Gao; Ze Lu; Michael G Wientjes; Max Tsai; M Guillaume Wientjes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Tumor-penetrating microparticles for intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Max Tsai; Dan Lu; Jie Wang; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Nanoparticle tumor localization, disruption of autophagosomal trafficking, and prolonged drug delivery improve survival in peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Aaron H Colby; Denis Gilmore; Morgan Schulz; Jialiu Zeng; Robert F Padera; Orian Shirihai; Mark W Grinstaff; Yolonda L Colson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.