Literature DB >> 20198409

Drug delivery systems for intraperitoneal therapy.

Gaurav Bajaj1, Yoon Yeo.   

Abstract

Disorders associated with the peritoneal cavity include peritoneal adhesions and intraperitoneal (IP) malignancies. To prevent peritoneal adhesions, physical barrier devices are used to prevent organs from contacting other structures in the abdomen and forming adhesions, or pharmacological agents that interfere with adhesion formation are administered intraperitoneally. IP malignancies are other disorders confined to the peritoneal cavity, which are treated by combination of surgical removal and chemotherapy of the residual tumor. IP drug delivery helps in the regional therapy of these disorders by providing relatively high concentration and longer half-life of a drug in the peritoneal cavity. Various studies suggest that IP delivery of anti-neoplastic agents is a promising approach for malignancies in the peritoneal cavity compared to the systemic administration. However, IP drug delivery faces several challenges, such as premature clearance of a small molecular weight drug from the peritoneal cavity, lack of target specificity, and poor drug penetration into the target tissues. Previous studies have proposed the use of micro/nanoparticles and/or hydrogel-based systems for prolonging the drug residence time in the peritoneal cavity. This commentary discusses the currently used IP drug delivery systems either clinically or experimentally and the remaining challenges in IP drug delivery for future development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198409      PMCID: PMC2854252          DOI: 10.1007/s11095-009-0031-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  45 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based medicine in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Aviram Nissan; Alexander Stojadinovic; Alfredo Garofalo; Jesus Esquivel; Pompiliu Piso
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study.

Authors:  B Sadeghi; C Arvieux; O Glehen; A C Beaujard; M Rivoire; J Baulieux; E Fontaumard; A Brachet; J L Caillot; J L Faure; J Porcheron; J L Peix; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Intraperitoneal drug delivery of antineoplastics.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Prognostic factors of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  J I Akahira; H Yoshikawa; Y Shimizu; R Tsunematsu; T Hirakawa; H Kuramoto; K Shiromizu; K Kuzuya; T Kamura; Y Kikuchi; S Kodama; K Yamamoto; S Sato
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management.

Authors:  T Liakakos; N Thomakos; P M Fine; C Dervenis; R L Young
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

7.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin-based chemotherapy vs. intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M S Yen; C M Juang; C R Lai; G C Chao; H T Ng; C C Yuan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Nuclear delivery of doxorubicin via folate-targeted liposomes with bypass of multidrug-resistance efflux pump.

Authors:  D Goren; A T Horowitz; D Tzemach; M Tarshish; S Zalipsky; A Gabizon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Influence of Cremophor El on the bioavailability of intraperitoneal paclitaxel.

Authors:  Hans Gelderblom; Jaap Verweij; Desirée M van Zomeren; Dirk Buijs; Linda Ouwens; Kees Nooter; Gerrit Stoter; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  34 in total

1.  Enhancing delivery of small molecule and cell-based therapies for ovarian cancer using advanced delivery strategies.

Authors:  Joanne O'Dwyer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert Wylie; Saoirse O'Mahony; Michael O'Dwyer; Garry P Duffy; Eimear B Dolan
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-08-16

Review 2.  Progress toward in vivo use of siRNAs-II.

Authors:  Garrett R Rettig; Mark A Behlke
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Intraperitoneal Route of Drug Administration: Should it Be Used in Experimental Animal Studies?

Authors:  Abdullah Al Shoyaib; Sabrina Rahman Archie; Vardan T Karamyan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Stromal Modulation and Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer with Local Intraperitoneal Triple miRNA/siRNA Nanotherapy.

Authors:  Ying Xie; Yu Hang; Yazhe Wang; Richard Sleightholm; Dipakkumar R Prajapati; Johannes Bader; Ao Yu; Weimin Tang; Lee Jaramillo; Jing Li; Rakesh K Singh; David Oupický
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin via an in situ cross-linkable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shigenobu Emoto; Hironori Yamaguchi; Takao Kamei; Hironori Ishigami; Takashi Suhara; Yukimitsu Suzuki; Taichi Ito; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Improved i.p. drug delivery with bioadhesive nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yang Deng; Fan Yang; Emiliano Cocco; Eric Song; Junwei Zhang; Jiajia Cui; Muneeb Mohideen; Stefania Bellone; Alessandro D Santin; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Intraperitoneal delivery of paclitaxel by poly(ether-anhydride) microspheres effectively suppresses tumor growth in a murine metastatic ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Tao Yu; Joseph Wood; Ying-Ying Wang; Benjamin C Tang; Qi Zeng; Brian W Simons; Jie Fu; Chi-Mu Chuang; Samuel K Lai; T-C Wu; Chien-Fu Hung; Justin Hanes
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.617

8.  Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) micelles for combination drug delivery: evaluation of paclitaxel, cyclopamine and gossypol in intraperitoneal xenograft models of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hyunah Cho; Tsz Chung Lai; Glen S Kwon
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Near-infrared fluorescent imaging of metastatic ovarian cancer using folate receptor-targeted high-density lipoprotein nanocarriers.

Authors:  Ian R Corbin; Kenneth K Ng; Lili Ding; Andrea Jurisicova; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.307

10.  Nanoparticle tumor localization, disruption of autophagosomal trafficking, and prolonged drug delivery improve survival in peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Aaron H Colby; Denis Gilmore; Morgan Schulz; Jialiu Zeng; Robert F Padera; Orian Shirihai; Mark W Grinstaff; Yolonda L Colson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.