Literature DB >> 10453663

Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations.

G Polizzi1, S Fabbro, M Furri, I Herrmann, S Squarzoni.   

Abstract

Replacing small, single incisors with implants can be esthetically challenging and difficult because of the limited amount of bone. In this investigation, 3.0-mm-diameter implants were used to support 30 single maxillary and mandibular incisors in 21 patients. The implants have been in function for 3 to 7 years, and 29 are still stable. Only 2 complications in the mandibular incisor region have occurred; 1 implant fractured (after 5 years of function) and 1 prosthesis was replaced. The overall success rate is 96.7%. The favorable results and esthetic appearance achieved suggest that replacing small incisors where light occlusal forces are present with narrower implants is a feasible treatment option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10453663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Immediate provisionalization in the esthetic zone: 1-year interim results from a prospective single-cohort multicenter study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.

Authors:  Martin Kolinski; Pablo Hess; Sonia Leziy; Bertil Friberg; Gionata Bellucci; Davide Trisciuoglio; Wilfried Wagner; Maximilian Moergel; Alessandro Pozzi; Jörg Wiltfang; Eleonore Behrens; Werner Zechner; Christoph Vasak; Paul Weigl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical evaluation of small diameter straumann implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  M Yaltirik; B Gökçen-Röhlig; S Ozer; G Evlioglu
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 3.  Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jatin K Jain; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sameer Chauhan; Piyush Javiya; Shreya Srivastava; Rutvik Patel; Bhagyashri Bhalani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  A Comparative Analysis of Implants Presenting Different Diameters: Extra-Narrow, Narrow and Conventional.

Authors:  Henrique Tuzzolo Neto; Alessandra Sayuri Tuzita; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; Renata de Vasconcellos Moura; Márcio Zaffalon Casati; Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra-narrow implants at 12-month follow-up: A case report.

Authors:  Geninho Thomé; Camila Pereira Vianna; Waleska Caldas; Sergio Rocha Bernardes; Jean Uhlendorf; Carolina Accorsi Cartelli; Larissa Carvalho Trojan
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-24

6.  Narrow diameter implant in posterior region.

Authors:  Jumshad B Mohamed; Md Nazish Alam; Arif Salman; S C Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-10

7.  Narrow-diameter implants with conical connection for restoring the posterior edentulous region.

Authors:  In-Hee Woo; Ju-Won Kim; So-Young Kang; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08-05

8.  Narrow implants (2.75 and 3.25 mm diameter) supporting a fixed splinted prostheses in posterior regions of mandible: one-year results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tommaso Grandi; Luigi Svezia; Giovanni Grandi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-09-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.