Literature DB >> 29397467

Immediate provisionalization in the esthetic zone: 1-year interim results from a prospective single-cohort multicenter study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.

Martin Kolinski1, Pablo Hess2, Sonia Leziy3, Bertil Friberg4, Gionata Bellucci5, Davide Trisciuoglio5, Wilfried Wagner6, Maximilian Moergel6, Alessandro Pozzi7, Jörg Wiltfang8, Eleonore Behrens8, Werner Zechner9, Christoph Vasak9, Paul Weigl2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this interim analysis of a 5-year prospective multicenter study is to evaluate clinical and radiological performance of immediately provisionalized 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients needing implant rehabilitation of maxillary lateral incisors or mandibular lateral and central incisors were treated with 3.0-mm-diameter implants placed in extraction or healed sites and immediately provisionalized. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at implant insertion, 6 months thereafter, and are ongoing. Marginal bone levels and changes, complications, the papilla, plaque, and bleeding indices, and the pink esthetic score (PES) were evaluated at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Of 112 enrolled patients, 77 patients (91 implants) met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-one patients with 82 implants completed the 1-year follow-up. Three implants failed yielding a CSR of 96.7%. All failures occurred within the first 3 months after implant insertion. Marginal bone level changes from insertion to 6 months was - 0.57 ± 1.30 mm (n = 75) and from insertion to 12 months - 0.25 ± 1.38 mm (n = 72). Fifteen non-serious complications were recorded. Papilla index score and PES improved at the 1-year follow-up. Plaque formation and bleeding-on-probing showed no statistically significant differences between the 6-month and the 1-year visit.
CONCLUSIONS: This 1-year analysis demonstrated high survival, stable bone levels, and healthy soft tissue with 3.0-mm-diameter implants. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Narrow diameter implants are a safe and predictable treatment option in patients with limited bone volume and/or limited interdental space and eligible for immediate loading protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esthetic zone; Immediate loading; Narrow diameter implants; Single tooth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29397467     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2329-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  25 in total

1.  Immediate supracrestal implant placement with immediate temporization in the anterior dentition: a retrospective study of 31 implants in 26 patients with up to 5.5-years follow-up.

Authors:  Stefan Paul; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Daniel Buser; William Martin; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Implants in the esthetic zone.

Authors:  Mohanad Al-Sabbagh
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07

4.  The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study.

Authors:  Simon Rupert Allum; Rachel Anne Tomlinson; Rajendra Joshi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten W Slagter; Laurens den Hartog; Nicolaas A Bakker; Arjan Vissink; Henny J A Meijer; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of one-piece and two-piece small-diameter dental implants: In-vitro experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses.

Authors:  Aaron Yu-Jen Wu; Jui-Ting Hsu; Winston Chee; Yun-Te Lin; Lih-Jyh Fuh; Heng-Li Huang
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Preserving soft tissue after placing implants in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone and a prosthetic template for interim crown fabrication: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Bruno; Dominic O'Sullivan; Mauro Badino; Santo Catapano
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.

Authors:  Marc O Klein; Eik Schiegnitz; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marco Degidi; Diego Nardi; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 10.  Narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review.

Authors:  José-Luis Sierra-Sánchez; Amparo Martínez-González; Fernando García-Sala Bonmatí; José-Félix Mañes-Ferrer; Alejandro Brotons-Oliver
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-01-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of maxillary lateral incisors rehabilitation using Morse taper connection extra-narrow implants at 12-month follow-up: A case report.

Authors:  Geninho Thomé; Camila Pereira Vianna; Waleska Caldas; Sergio Rocha Bernardes; Jean Uhlendorf; Carolina Accorsi Cartelli; Larissa Carvalho Trojan
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-24

2.  A Retrospective Observational Study Assessing the Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Implant System with Low-Speed Site Preparation Protocol and Tri-Oval Implant Geometry.

Authors:  Giacomo Fabbri; Tristan Staas; Istvan Urban
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.