Literature DB >> 10452227

Validation of Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system.

G A King1, J E McLaughlin, E T Howley, D R Bassett, B E Ainsworth.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag method. During cycle ergometry, simultaneous measurements of minute ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were made at rest and at power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 W. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed for VE, VO2, and VCO2 between the KB1-C and Douglas bag at 100, 150, and 250 W, while the KB1-C was significantly different (P < 0.05) from Douglas bag values at rest, 50, and 200 W. R values were found to be significantly different (P < 0.05) at 100, 150, and 200 W, while no significant differences were observed at rest, 50, and 250 W. The fractional concentrations of oxygen (FEO2) and carbon dioxide (FECO2) were not significantly different at 50, 100, 200, and 250 W while values at rest and 150 W were significantly different (P < 0.05). These findings show that the Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake in the range of 1.5 and 3.5 L x min(-1), using the medium flow pneumotach setting. At lower intensities, the low-flow pneumotach setting provides acceptable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452227     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-971135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  9 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and kinematic responses to stationary running performed in water and on dry land.

Authors:  Cristine Lima Alberton; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Stephanie Santana Pinto; Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga; Eduardo Marczwski da Silva; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Amanda Antczak; Jonathan R Hudak; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Effects of Aging on Perceived Exertion and Pain During Arm Cranking in Women 70 to 80 YEARS OLD.

Authors:  Alain Groslambert; Céline C Grange; Stéphane Perrey; Jérôme Maire; Nicolas Tordi; Jean Denis Rouillon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Open-circuit respirometry: a historical review of portable gas analysis systems.

Authors:  Duncan J Macfarlane
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Validation of a new portable metabolic system during an incremental running test.

Authors:  Víctor Díaz; Pedro José Benito; Ana Belén Peinado; María Alvarez; Carlos Martín; Valter Di Salvo; Fabio Pigozzi; Nicola Maffulli; Fracisco Javier Calderón
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Reliability of the VmaxST portable metabolic measurement system.

Authors:  J Blessinger; B Sawyer; C Davis; B A Irving; A Weltman; G Gaesser
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Reliable Breathing Tracking with Wearable Mask Device.

Authors:  Vishal Varan Tipparaju; Xiaojun Xian; Devon Bridgeman; Di Wang; Francis Tsow; Erica Forzani; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.301

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.