Literature DB >> 10452216

Event-related potentials and saccadic reaction times: effects of fixation point offset or change.

A Spantekow1, P Krappmann, S Everling, H Flohr.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that saccadic reaction times (SRTs) are reduced if the initial fixation point (FP) disappears 200 ms (gap period) before a peripheral target is presented. This gap saccade task is associated with a negative cortical potential at the end of the gap period. To determine whether the neural processes underlying this potential account for the reduction of SRTs during gap saccade tasks, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in 19 subjects performing a gap saccade task (gap duration 200 ms), a warning saccade task (the color of the FP changed 200 ms prior to target appearance) and an overlap task (the FP remained visible during the trial). SRTs were shortest during the gap task, longest during the overlap task and intermediate during the warning task. The gap and warning tasks were accompanied by the same widespread negative cortical potential with a maximum at the time of stimulus presentation. These findings indicate that the warning effect mediated by the disappearance of the FP during gap saccade tasks is responsible for the gap negativity which was observed by several authors. Our findings of shorter SRTs during the gap task than the warning task, however, suggest that the gap has an additional effect that probably depends on subcortical mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452216     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

1.  Effects of ethanol on anti-saccade task performance.

Authors:  Sarah A Khan; Kristen Ford; Brian Timney; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential effects of blinks on horizontal saccade and smooth pursuit initiation in humans.

Authors:  Holger Rambold; Ieman El Baz; Christoph Helmchen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of target probability on saccade latencies in gap and warning tasks.

Authors:  Sandra Dick; Norbert Kathmann; Florian Ostendorf; Christoph J Ploner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Knowing when to trust others: an ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people.

Authors:  Cheryl Boudreau; Mathew D McCubbins; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Influence of sports experience on distribution of pro-saccade reaction time under gap condition.

Authors:  Kenji Kunita; Katsuo Fujiwara
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.867

6.  Cortical dynamics during the preparation of antisaccadic and prosaccadic eye movements in humans in a gap paradigm.

Authors:  Isabel Cordones; Carlos M Gómez; Miguel Escudero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.