Literature DB >> 14968272

Differential effects of blinks on horizontal saccade and smooth pursuit initiation in humans.

Holger Rambold1, Ieman El Baz, Christoph Helmchen.   

Abstract

Blinks executed during eye movements affect kinetic eye movement parameters, e.g., peak velocity of saccades is decreased, their duration is increased, but their amplitude is not altered. This effect is mainly explained by the decreased activity of premotor neurons in the brainstem: omni-pause neurons (OPN) in the nucleus raphe interpositus. Previous studies examined the immediate effect of blinks directly on eye movements but not their effect when they are elicited several hundred milliseconds before the eye movements. In order to address this question we tested blinks elicited before the target onset of saccades and pursuit and compared the results to the gap effect: if a fixation light is extinguished for several hundred milliseconds, the reaction time (latency) for subsequent saccades or smooth pursuit eye movements is decreased. Monocular eye and lid movements were recorded in nine healthy subjects using the scleral search-coil system. Laser stimuli were front-projected onto a tangent screen in front of the subjects. Horizontal step-ramp smooth pursuit of 20 deg/s was elicited in one session, or 5 deg horizontal visually guided saccades in another experimental session. In one-third of the trials (smooth pursuit or saccades) the fixation light was extinguished for 200 ms before stimulus onset (gap condition), and in another third of the trials reflexive blinks were elicited by a short airpuff before the stimulus onset (blink condition). The last third of the trials served as controls (control condition). Stimulus direction and the three conditions were randomized for saccades and smooth pursuit separately. The latency of the step-ramp smooth pursuit in the blink condition was found to be decreased by 10 ms, which was less than in the gap condition (38 ms). However, the initial acceleration and steady-state velocity of smooth pursuit did not differ in the three conditions. In contrast, the latency of the saccades in the gap condition was decreased by 39 ms, but not in the blink condition. Saccade amplitude, peak velocity, and duration were not different in the three conditions. There was also no difference in blink amplitude and duration of pupil occlusion in the blink condition, neither in saccades nor in smooth pursuit. The latency reduction of smooth pursuit, but not of saccades, may neither be explained by the brief pupil occlusion nor by visual suppression, warning signals, or the startle response. Whether the effects are caused by the influence of blinks on OPNs or other premotor structures remains to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14968272     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1791-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Upper eyelid movements measured with a search coil during blinks and vertical saccades.

Authors:  D Guitton; R Simard; F Codère
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Properties of horizontal saccades accompanied by blinks.

Authors:  K G Rottach; V E Das; W Wohlgemuth; A Z Zivotofsky; R J Leigh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effect of the gap paradigm on the latency of human smooth pursuit of eye movement.

Authors:  P C Knox
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-11-25       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Dependence of visual suppression on the angular size of voluntary saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  L Mitrani; N Yakimoff; S Mateeff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Blink-induced saccadic oscillations.

Authors:  T C Hain; D S Zee; M Mordes
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Initiation of saccades during fixation or pursuit: evidence in humans for a single mechanism.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Dependence of visual suppression on the amplitudes of saccades and blinks.

Authors:  S B Stevenson; F C Volkmann; J P Kelly; L A Riggs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Blink-saccade synkinesis.

Authors:  D S Zee; F C Chu; R J Leigh; P J Savino; N J Schatz; D B Reingold; D G Cogan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  9 in total

1.  Temporal interactions of air-puff-evoked blinks and saccadic eye movements: insights into motor preparation.

Authors:  Neeraj J Gandhi; Desiree K Bonadonna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Blink effects on ongoing smooth pursuit eye movements in humans.

Authors:  Holger Rambold; Ieman El Baz; Christoph Helmchen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Blink amplitude but not saccadic hypometria indicates carriers of Parkin mutations.

Authors:  C Helmchen; A Schwekendiek; P P Pramstaller; K Hedrich; C Klein; H Rambold
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Behavioral evaluation of movement cancellation.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Macaque pontine omnipause neurons play no direct role in the generation of eye blinks.

Authors:  K P Schultz; C R Williams; C Busettini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Blinks slow memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Alice S Powers; Michele A Basso; Craig Evinger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Interactions between gaze-evoked blinks and gaze shifts in monkeys.

Authors:  Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Quantitative differences in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M R Burke; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Ganzfeld stimulation or sleep enhance long term motor memory consolidation compared to normal viewing in saccadic adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  Caroline Voges; Christoph Helmchen; Wolfgang Heide; Andreas Sprenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.