Literature DB >> 15864566

Differential effects of target probability on saccade latencies in gap and warning tasks.

Sandra Dick1, Norbert Kathmann, Florian Ostendorf, Christoph J Ploner.   

Abstract

Saccade latencies are significantly reduced by extinguishing a foveal fixation stimulus before the appearance of a saccade target. It has been shown recently that this "fixation offset effect" (FOE) can be modulated by varying target probability. Cortico-collicular top-down effects have been assumed to mediate this strategic FOE modulation. Here, we have investigated strategic FOE modulation in 14 healthy human subjects performing gap and warning tasks. In the former task, the central fixation point was extinguished 200 ms before target onset. In the latter task, the central fixation point changed its colour 200 ms before target onset, but remained illuminated until the target appeared. Target probability was varied block-wise between 25 and 75%. In both tasks, mean latencies decreased with increasing target probability. However, in contrast with what can be expected from preceding studies, we found no differential modulation of mean latencies by target probability between tasks. Instead, we observed differential probability-dependent changes in latency distributions. In the gap task, discrete changes of saccade latencies were found, with a probability-dependent change in frequency of express and regular latencies. By contrast, in the warning task a shift of the entire latency distribution towards longer latencies with low target probability was found. We conclude that strategic modulation of saccade latencies by target probability may be mediated by two distinct neural mechanisms. Selection of either mechanism seems to depend critically on activation of the fixation system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864566     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2266-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  S Everling; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Occurrence of human express saccades depends on stimulus uncertainty and stimulus sequence.

Authors:  M Jüttner; W Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Saccadic reaction times: a statistical analysis of multimodal distributions.

Authors:  S Gezeck; B Fischer; J Timmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The role of visual and cognitive processes in the control of eye movement.

Authors:  E Kowler
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1990

5.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Express saccades elicited during visual scan in the monkey.

Authors:  M A Sommer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Target size modulates saccadic eye movements in humans.

Authors:  Christoph J Ploner; Florian Ostendorf; Sandra Dick
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Separate populations of visually guided saccades in humans: reaction times and amplitudes.

Authors:  B Fischer; H Weber; M Biscaldi; F Aiple; P Otto; V Stuhr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J H Sandell; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Douglas Perry Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Activity of primate V1 neurons during the gap saccade task.

Authors:  Kayeon Kim; Choongkil Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Impaired control of the oculomotor reflexes in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Martijn G van Koningsbruggen; Tom Pender; Liana Machado; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Enhanced antisaccade abilities in children with Tourette syndrome: the Gap-effect Reversal.

Authors:  Diana J Tajik-Parvinchi; Paul Sandor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effects of a pretarget distractor on saccade reaction times across space and time in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Douglas P Munoz; Naomi Takahashi; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.