Literature DB >> 10449973

Recommendation for the examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens removed from patients with carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas. A proposal for a standardized pathological staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens including a checklist.

J Lüttges1, G Zamboni, G Klöppel.   

Abstract

The prognosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is poor. Despite many attempts at a more aggressive surgical approach, tumor recurrence rates of around 80% are common. For various reasons, most of the studies on the subject are difficult to compare. Not only do the surgical techniques vary, but, more importantly, the methods used for processing the specimens and for the pathological examination differ. If we are to improve the situation, it would appear imperative to standardize procedures. Standardized pathological staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens should be performed mainly with reference to the guidelines of the WHO and UICC, with optional staging of the lymph nodes according to their anatomical site. Precise definition and accurate examination of the resection margins, especially of that towards the retroperitoneum, is essential for a better comparison of the results of the different therapeutic strategies and approaches to pancreatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10449973     DOI: 10.1159/000018738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  20 in total

1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Intraoperative assessment of the Whipple resection specimen.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  A novel approach to the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa; Vlad Maksymov; Corwyn H Rowsell; Sherif Hanna
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Other Tumoral Intraepithelial Neoplasms of Pancreatobiliary Tract: Recommendations of Verona Consensus Meeting.

Authors:  Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Pathology handling of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens: Approaches and controversies.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Gómez-Mateo; Luis Sabater-Ortí; Antonio Ferrández-Izquierdo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 7.  [Pancreatic cancer in the elderly: guidelines and individualized therapy].

Authors:  H Nieß; A Kleespies; J Andrassy; S Pratschke; P Pratschke; M K Angele; M Guba; K-W Jauch; C J Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  An anatomical-based mapping analysis of the pancreaticoduodenectomy retroperitoneal margin highlights the urgent need for standardized assessment.

Authors:  Vlad Maksymov; Michael Hogan; Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a UK tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  E J Clark; M A Taylor; S Connor; R O'Neill; M F Brennan; O J Garden; R W Parks
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Differentiation markers in pancreatic head adenocarcinomas: MUC1 and MUC4 expression indicates poor prognosis in pancreatobiliary differentiated tumours.

Authors:  Arne Westgaard; Aasa R Schjølberg; Milada Cvancarova; Tor J Eide; Ole Petter F Clausen; Ivar P Gladhaug
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.