Literature DB >> 7931758

Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold.

H S Smallman1, D I MacLeod.   

Abstract

Contrast thresholds for 75% correct depth identification in narrow-band filtered random dot stereograms were determined for different center spatial frequencies and binocular disparities. Rigorous control over vergence was maintained during testing, and a forced-choice procedure was used. The resulting contrast sensitivity function for stereopsis revealed sensitivity over a greater range of disparities at low than at high spatial frequencies. Sensitivity peaked for large disparities at low spatial frequencies and for small disparities at high spatial frequencies. When disparities were converted to effective binocular phase differences, the variation of contrast sensitivity with phase followed a consistent pattern across spatial frequencies, with peak sensitivity occurring mainly for binocular phases of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees. These results have implications for the extent of spatial integration at the input to the disparity sensing mechanism. A model postulating a spread of positional disparities independent of the spatial frequency selectivity of disparity-sensitive units cannot account for the results. But the size-disparity correlation strongly evident in our data is predicted by certain models of stereopsis, such as phase disparity encoding. An ideal observer analysis is developed that demonstrates that our results were not forced by the nature of the stimulus employed; rather, the quantum efficiency for stereopsis at contrast threshold follows the size-disparity correlation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931758     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.11.002169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  16 in total

1.  Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception.

Authors:  S J Prince; R A Eagle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Julian Martin Fernandez; Bart Farell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Terminator disparity contributes to stereo matching for eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Is correspondence search in human stereo vision a coarse-to-fine process?

Authors:  H A Mallot; S Gillner; P A Arndt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Solving stereo transparency with an extended coarse-to-fine disparity energy model.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ning Qian
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatial stereoresolution for depth corrugations may be set in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Mechanisms for similarity matching in disparity measurement.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-08

Review 10.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.