Literature DB >> 22395870

Spinal cord injury resulting from injury missed on CT scan: the danger of relying on CT alone for collar removal.

Gregory Gebauer1, Meredith Osterman, James Harrop, Alexander Vaccaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strict criteria have been used before removing cervical collars in patients with injuries who have midline pain or are unable to be reliably examined. This sometimes leads to prolonged immobilization in cervical collars or use of MRI to rule out injury. Several studies suggest a collar may be removed in the absence of fractures, dislocation, or pathologic subluxation on a cervical CT scan. This may avoid the morbidity of prolonged cervical immobilization or cost of advanced imaging study but risks devastating consequences from missing injuries. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a patient with a cervical spinal cord injury after removal of a collar after a CT scan was misinterpreted as normal. Retrospective review of the CT showed subtle signs of widening between the spinous processes of the injured level, a finding easily missed without the use of further imaging studies. LITERATURE REVIEW: Several articles suggest cervical collars may be safely removed from awake and alert patients and in patients who cannot be reliably examined after a negative CT scan without the need for further imaging. PURPOSES AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CT scans are excellent at detecting bony injuries but not ligamentous injuries. Removing cervical collars based on CT scans alone may be expeditious, but some injuries may be missed without further imaging. Our case demonstrates the catastrophic consequences of missing a cervical spine injury and emphasizes the need for maintaining the cervical collar in high-risk patients until proper imaging can be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395870      PMCID: PMC3348314          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2286-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS).

Authors:  J R Hoffman; A B Wolfson; K Todd; W R Mower
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury.

Authors:  R P Gonzalez; P O Fried; M Bukhalo; M R Holevar; M E Falimirski
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Is magnetic resonance imaging essential in clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma?

Authors:  John J Como; Marsha A Thompson; James S Anderson; Rajiv R Shah; Jeffrey A Claridge; Charles J Yowler; Mark A Malangoni
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-09

4.  Computed tomography for early and safe discontinuation of cervical spine immobilization in obtunded multiply injured patients.

Authors:  Henry Thomas Stelfox; George C Velmahos; Elise Gettings; Luca M Bigatello; Ulrich Schmidt
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-09

5.  Spinal clearance in the difficult trauma patient: a role for screening MRI of the spine.

Authors:  John M Adams; Mark I E Cockburn; Louis T Difazio; Felix A Garcia; Brian K Siegel; Jaroslaw W Bilaniuk
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Computed tomography alone for cervical spine clearance in the unreliable patient--are we there yet?

Authors:  Jay Menaker; Allan Philp; Sharon Boswell; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-04

7.  Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients.

Authors:  Reshma Mathen; Kenji Inaba; Felipe Munera; Pedro G R Teixeira; Luis Rivas; Mark McKenney; Peter Lopez; Carlos J Ledezma
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-06

8.  MRI is unnecessary to clear the cervical spine in obtunded/comatose trauma patients: the four-year experience of a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Nestor D Tomycz; Brandon G Chew; Yue-Fang Chang; Joseph M Darby; Scott R Gunn; Dederia H Nicholas; Juan B Ochoa; Andrew B Peitzman; Eric Schwartz; Hans-Christoph Pape; Richard M Spiro; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-05

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan D Muchow; Daniel K Resnick; Matthew P Abdel; Alejandro Munoz; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01

Review 10.  Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Brian P Brocker; B David Collier; David J Gemmel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Authors:  Mayur B Patel; Stephen S Humble; Daniel C Cullinane; Matthew A Day; Randeep S Jawa; Clinton J Devin; Margaret S Delozier; Lou M Smith; Miya A Smith; Jeannette M Capella; Andrea M Long; Joseph S Cheng; Taylor C Leath; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Elliott R Haut; John J Como
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Clinical significance of "positive" cervical spine MRI findings following a negative CT.

Authors:  Bharti Khurana; Abhishek Keraliya; George Velmahos; Adrian A Maung; Christopher M Bono; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.