Literature DB >> 10433425

The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model.

S Hansson1, M Norton.   

Abstract

A rough bone implant surface was conceptualized as being built up of pits of different sizes and of different shapes. Hypotheses were formulated regarding the mechanical strength of the interfacial bone based upon the present knowledge of the character of the tissues adjacent to endosseous implants and the mechanical characteristics of different bone constituents. A surface roughness parameter was derived, the pit effectivity factor (fpe), which describes how effective the individual pits of the rough surface are as retention elements with regard to shear. Another surface roughness parameter was defined, the pit density factor (fpd), the value of which depends upon how densely packed the pits are. The interfacial shear strength of a rough implant surface with known microgeometry can be estimated by means of these two surface roughness parameters. The effectiveness of pits of different sizes and of different shapes was investigated using this model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10433425     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  The influence of micro and macro-geometry in term of bone-implant interface in two implant systems: an histomorphometrical study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M DI Girolamo; M Rocci; C Rocci; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

2.  Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through large-grit sandblasting combined with micro-arc oxidation surface modification.

Authors:  Wulin He; Xing Yin; Li Xie; Zeping Liu; Jingtao Li; Shujuan Zou; Jianwei Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Different performance of platform switching in equicrestal position implant: an histological study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M Rocci; C Rocci; M DI Girolamo; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

4.  Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans.

Authors:  M Rocci; A Rocci; M Martignoni; T Albrektsson; A Barlattani; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

5.  Cumulative survival rate of Astra Tech implants: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jung-Soo Kim; Joo-Yeon Sohn; Jung-Chul Park; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee; June-Sung Shim; Keun-Woo Lee; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Use of separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study for up to 1 year.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kwon; In-Sung Yeo; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Diameter-sensitive biocompatibility of anodic TiO2 nanotubes treated with supercritical CO2 fluid.

Authors:  Ming-Ying Lan; Chia-Pei Liu; Her-Hsiung Huang; Jeng-Kuei Chang; Sheng-Wei Lee
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  Evaluation of biological properties of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V implant with biomimetic coating in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ya-Fei Feng; Cheng-Tao Wang; Guo-Chen Li; Wei Lei; Zhi-Yong Zhang; Lin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.