Literature DB >> 10430142

Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients.

S Karoui1, C Savoye-Collet, E Koning, A M Leroi, P Denis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of anal sphincter defects on anal sonography of incontinent and continent patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-eight consecutive subjects who underwent anal sonography were studied. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects was calculated in 335 incontinent patients, 115 continent patients, and 18 asymptomatic female volunteers. All subjects answered a questionnaire about childbirth and proctologic surgery.
RESULTS: The prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed on sonography was 65% in the 335 incontinent patients. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in incontinent patients was 88% in patients with a history of childbirth and proctologic surgery and 62% with childbirth alone. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed on sonography was 43% in continent patients and 22% in asymptomatic volunteers. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in continent patients with a history of childbirth and proctologic surgery was 92% and was 41% with childbirth alone. We found no difference in the prevalence of sphincter defects according to the age and sex of patients.
CONCLUSION: Anal sonography can be used to identify sphincter defects in approximately two thirds of incontinent patients. Prevalence is greater in patients with a history of proctologic surgery. Because of the presence of sphincter defects in continent patients and in asymptomatic volunteers, caution should be used in attributing incontinence to anal sphincter defects alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430142     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anal and Perineal Injuries.

Authors:  Arjun N Jeganathan; Jeremy W Cannon; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

2.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in Latin America: initial results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  L Oliveira; G Hagerman; M L Torres; C M Lumi; J A C Siachoque; J C Reyes; J Perez-Aguirre; J C Sanchez-Robles; V H Guerrero-Guerrero; S M Regadas; V G Filho; G Rosato; E Vieira; L Marzan; D Lima; E Londoño-Schimmer; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Usefulness of anorectal and endovaginal 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of sphincter and pubovisceral muscle defects using a new scoring system in women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Graziela Olivia da S Fernandes; Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas; Lusmar Veras Rodrigues; Francisco Sergio Pinheiro Regadas Filho; Iris Daiana Dealcanfreitas; Adjra da Silva Vilarinho; Mariana Murad da Cruz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

Authors:  Massarat Zutshi; Levilester Salcedo; Jeffrey Hammel; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  [Effectiveness of liberal vs. conservative episiotomy in vaginal delivery with reference to preventing urinary and fecal incontinence: a systematic review].

Authors:  Gabriele Schlömer; Mechthild Gross; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Karim Alavi; Sook Chan; Paul Wise; Andreas M Kaiser; Ranjan Sudan; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Metrics Used to Quantify Fecal Incontinence and Constipation.

Authors:  Cameron W Hunt; Paul M Cavallaro; Liliana G Bordeianou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.